Literature DB >> 7732035

Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information.

D M Burt1, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

This study investigated visual cues to age by using facial composites which blend shape and colour information from multiple faces. Baseline measurements showed that perceived age of adult male faces is on average an accurate index of their chronological age over the age range 20-60 years. Composite images were made from multiple images of different faces by averaging face shape and then blending red, green and blue intensity (RGB colour) across comparable pixels. The perceived age of these composite or blended images depended on the age bracket of the component faces. Blended faces were, however, rated younger than their component faces, a trend that became more marked with increased component age. The techniques used provide an empirical definition of facial changes with age that are biologically consistent across a sample population. The perceived age of a blend of old faces was increased by exaggerating the RGB colour differences of each pixel relative to a blend of young faces. This effect on perceived age was not attributable to enhanced contrast or colour saturation. Age-related visual cues defined from the differences between blends of young and old faces were applied to individual faces. These transformations increased perceived age.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7732035     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  Hand movements reveal the time-course of shape and pigmentation processing in face categorization.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

2.  Appealing to vanity: could potential appearance improvement motivate fruit and vegetable consumption?

Authors:  Ross D Whitehead; Gozde Ozakinci; Ian D Stephen; David I Perrett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Yi He; Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Testosterone reduces the threat premium in competitive resource division.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Valentina Proietti; Brian M Bird; Triana L Ortiz; Pierre L Bonin; Bernard Goldfarb; Neil V Watson; Justin M Carré
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Computer assisted age progression.

Authors:  S J Gibson; C M Scandrett; C J Solomon; M I S Maylin; C M Wilkinson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Computer-enhanced emotion in facial expressions.

Authors:  A J Calder; A W Young; D Rowland; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evidence for an own-age bias in age estimation from voices in older persons.

Authors:  Evelyne Moyse; Aline Beaufort; Serge Brédart
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2014-02-12

8.  Monkeys recognize the faces of group mates in photographs.

Authors:  Jennifer J Pokorny; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Culture shapes efficiency of facial age judgments.

Authors:  Gizelle Anzures; Liezhong Ge; Zhe Wang; Shoji Itakura; Kang Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why some women look young for their age.

Authors:  David A Gunn; Helle Rexbye; Christopher E M Griffiths; Peter G Murray; Amelia Fereday; Sharon D Catt; Cyrena C Tomlin; Barbara H Strongitharm; Dave I Perrett; Michael Catt; Andrew E Mayes; Andrew G Messenger; Martin R Green; Frans van der Ouderaa; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.