C H Van Liew1, D S Greco, M D Salman. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of results of low-dose dexamethasone suppression (LDDS) and ACTH stimulation tests with necropsy findings in 81 dogs. DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: 81 dogs that had undergone screening tests for hyperadrenocorticism and that had a complete necropsy report. PROCEDURE: Medical records were evaluated for results of CBC, serum biochemical analysis, urinalysis, endocrine testing, signalment, treatment, and necropsy findings. Each dog was definitively classified as having true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, or false-negative results. Statistical analyses included determination of prevalence, apparent prevalence, accuracy, number of dogs misclassified, sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values. RESULTS: Of the 81 dogs that fit the criteria for selection, 40 (49%) were confirmed as having hyperadrenocorticism (30 had pituitary-dependent disease and 10 had adrenal gland tumors). Forty-one dogs had illnesses attributable to a cause other than disease of the adrenal glands. Sensitivity of ACTH stimulation and LDDS tests were 95 and 96%, respectively. Specificity for the ACTH stimulation test was higher (91%) than that of the LDDS test (70%). When prevalence of the disease in the study population was taken into consideration, the positive-predictive value for the ACTH stimulation test was 91%, compared with 76% for the LDDS test. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The ACTH stimulation test was more specific than the LDDS test, although sensitivity was similar for both tests. The ACTH stimulation test also had a significantly higher positive-predictive value than the LDDS test when a prevalence of 25% was taken into consideration.
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of results of low-dose dexamethasone suppression (LDDS) and ACTH stimulation tests with necropsy findings in 81 dogs. DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: 81 dogs that had undergone screening tests for hyperadrenocorticism and that had a complete necropsy report. PROCEDURE: Medical records were evaluated for results of CBC, serum biochemical analysis, urinalysis, endocrine testing, signalment, treatment, and necropsy findings. Each dog was definitively classified as having true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, or false-negative results. Statistical analyses included determination of prevalence, apparent prevalence, accuracy, number of dogs misclassified, sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values. RESULTS: Of the 81 dogs that fit the criteria for selection, 40 (49%) were confirmed as having hyperadrenocorticism (30 had pituitary-dependent disease and 10 had adrenal gland tumors). Forty-one dogs had illnesses attributable to a cause other than disease of the adrenal glands. Sensitivity of ACTH stimulation and LDDS tests were 95 and 96%, respectively. Specificity for the ACTH stimulation test was higher (91%) than that of the LDDS test (70%). When prevalence of the disease in the study population was taken into consideration, the positive-predictive value for the ACTH stimulation test was 91%, compared with 76% for the LDDS test. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The ACTH stimulation test was more specific than the LDDS test, although sensitivity was similar for both tests. The ACTH stimulation test also had a significantly higher positive-predictive value than the LDDS test when a prevalence of 25% was taken into consideration.
Authors: I Schofield; D C Brodbelt; S J M Niessen; D B Church; R F Geddes; D G O'Neill Journal: J Small Anim Pract Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 1.669
Authors: Imogen Schofield; David C Brodbelt; Noel Kennedy; Stijn J M Niessen; David B Church; Rebecca F Geddes; Dan G O'Neill Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniel K Langlois; Michele C Fritz; William D Schall; N Bari Olivier; Rebecca C Smedley; Paul G Pearson; Marc B Bailie; Stephen W Hunt Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Ran Nivy; Kent R Refsal; Ella Ariel; Sharon Kuzi; Einat Yas-Natan; Michal Mazaki-Tovi Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Imogen Schofield; David C Brodbelt; Anna R L Wilson; Stijn Niessen; David Church; Dan O'Neill Journal: Vet Rec Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 2.695
Authors: Imogen Schofield; David C Brodbelt; Stijn J M Niessen; David B Church; Rebecca F Geddes; Noel Kennedy; Dan G O'Neill Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.333