Literature DB >> 9262579

The autopsy: still important in cardiac surgery.

K J Zehr1, J R Liddicoat, J D Salazar, A M Gillinov, R H Hruban, G M Hutchins, D E Cameron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the ability of autopsy to confirm or dispute presumptive cause of death among cardiac surgery patients.
METHODS: Autopsy reports were compared with mortality conference notes that were dictated prospectively before autopsy results were available. Between January 1985 and December 1995, there were 600 hospital deaths among 13,029 adult cardiac surgery patients (4.6% mortality). Of these 600 deaths, 147 (24.5%) had postmortem examination.
RESULTS: Annual autopsy rate remained constant over the course of the study. Autopsied patients were younger (60.4 +/- 15 versus 66.7 +/- 13 years [mean +/- standard error of the mean]; p < 0.0001), but their race and sex distributions were similar to deceased patients not having autopsy. Autopsy confirmed clinical presumptive cause of death in 52% (76), disputed clinical diagnosis in 9.5% (14), provided definitive diagnosis in the absence of clinical diagnosis in 13.6% (20), and failed to provide definitive diagnosis in 25% (37). One third of autopsies (39%; 57) provided information that was clinically unrecognized and might have altered therapy and outcome if known premortem. As determined by autopsy, common causes of death were cardiac (27%; 39), unknown (25%; 37), sepsis (14%; 21), stroke (8.8%; 13), cholesterol embolism (4.1%; 6), pulmonary embolism (4.1%; 6), and adult respiratory distress syndrome (4.1%; 6).
CONCLUSIONS: Autopsy reveals or confirms cause of death in nearly three quarters of cardiac surgical deaths and provides information that differs significantly from premortem clinical impression more than 20% of the time. As such, the autopsy remains important to quality assurance in cardiac surgical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9262579     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00551-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Post mortem examinations after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M F Hickling; D E Pontefract; P J Gallagher; S A Livesey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  [Cardiac surgery in underlying chronic pulmonary disease. Prognostic implications and efficient preoperative evaluation].

Authors:  D Fistera; H Steveling; A Koch; H Teschler
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Autopsy and clinical discrepancies in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series-a step towards understanding "Why"?

Authors:  Chadi Aludaat; Matthieu Sarsam; Fabien Doguet; Jean-Marc Baste
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Medico-legal autopsy in postoperative hemodynamic collapse following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Janne P Karhunen; Pekka J Karhunen; Peter M Raivio; Eero I T Sihvo; Tiina L S Vainikka; Ulla-Stina Salminen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Association of Acute Venous Thromboembolism With In-Hospital Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad S Panhwar; Mahazarin Ginwalla; Ankur Kalra; Tanush Gupta; Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Deepak L Bhatt; Joseph F Sabik
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms in male determination and germ cell differentiation.

Authors:  L Ronfani; M E Bianchi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Ebrahim Bham; Warren Pavey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.