PURPOSE: Previous studies indicate that suramin may be an active agent for treating hormone-refractory prostate cancer. However, antitumour responses were observed in initial experiments only when plasma suramin concentrations were maintained in excess of 250 micrograms/ml. Dose-limiting toxicity, especially neurological toxicity, is directly related to the duration of exposure and sustained plasma drug concentrations of 300 micrograms/ml or more. Combination with other agents such as epidoxorubicin, a drug with demonstrable activity in metastatic prostatic carcinoma, could be more effective and allow reduced suramin doses, while maintaining the suramin antitumor effect; this could make suramin therapy more feasible. On the basis of preclinical synergistic activity for combined suramin/doxorubicin in prostate cancer cell lines, a pilot study in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer received a fixed dosing scheme of suramin infusion in combination with weekly epidoxorubicin at 25 mg/m2. Therapy was discontinued for dose-limiting toxicity or progressive disease. RESULTS: None of the ten patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen reduction of more than 50% and no objective responses were observed in any patient. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in four patients: grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed in three patients and grade 3 nephrotoxicity in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Suramin/epidoxorubicin association, despite the encouraging preclinical results, was not able to improve the antitumour activity of suramin and showed significant toxicity. The results achieved in our study, although in a small number of patients, seem to suggest that this regimen cannot be recommended for use in the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Previous studies indicate that suramin may be an active agent for treating hormone-refractory prostate cancer. However, antitumour responses were observed in initial experiments only when plasma suramin concentrations were maintained in excess of 250 micrograms/ml. Dose-limiting toxicity, especially neurological toxicity, is directly related to the duration of exposure and sustained plasma drug concentrations of 300 micrograms/ml or more. Combination with other agents such as epidoxorubicin, a drug with demonstrable activity in metastatic prostatic carcinoma, could be more effective and allow reduced suramin doses, while maintaining the suramin antitumor effect; this could make suramin therapy more feasible. On the basis of preclinical synergistic activity for combined suramin/doxorubicin in prostate cancer cell lines, a pilot study in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer received a fixed dosing scheme of suramin infusion in combination with weekly epidoxorubicin at 25 mg/m2. Therapy was discontinued for dose-limiting toxicity or progressive disease. RESULTS: None of the ten patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen reduction of more than 50% and no objective responses were observed in any patient. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in four patients: grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed in three patients and grade 3 nephrotoxicity in one patient. CONCLUSIONS:Suramin/epidoxorubicin association, despite the encouraging preclinical results, was not able to improve the antitumour activity of suramin and showed significant toxicity. The results achieved in our study, although in a small number of patients, seem to suggest that this regimen cannot be recommended for use in the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Authors: N A Dawson; W D Figg; M R Cooper; O Sartor; R C Bergan; A M Senderowicz; S M Steinberg; A Tompkins; B Weinberger; E A Sausville; E Reed; C E Myers Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M A Eisenberger; L M Reyno; D I Jodrell; V J Sinibaldi; K H Tkaczuk; R Sridhara; E G Zuhowski; M H Lowitt; S C Jacobs; M J Egorin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-04-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: C Myers; M Cooper; C Stein; R LaRocca; M M Walther; G Weiss; P Choyke; N Dawson; S Steinberg; M M Uhrich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R J Bitton; W D Figg; D J Venzon; M C Dalakas; C Bowden; D Headlee; E Reed; C E Myers; M R Cooper Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M A Eisenberger; V J Sinibaldi; L M Reyno; R Sridhara; D I Jodrell; E G Zuhowski; K H Tkaczuk; M H Lowitt; R K Hemady; S C Jacobs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S M Tu; K McConnell; M C Marin; M L Campbell; A Fernandez; A C von Eschenbach; T J McDonnell Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 1995-07-13 Impact factor: 8.679