Literature DB >> 9193342

Phase II trial of suramin, leuprolide, and flutamide in previously untreated metastatic prostate cancer.

N A Dawson1, W D Figg, M R Cooper, O Sartor, R C Bergan, A M Senderowicz, S M Steinberg, A Tompkins, B Weinberger, E A Sausville, E Reed, C E Myers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of suramin, hydrocortisone, leuprolide, and flutamide in previously untreated metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage D2 and poor-prognosis stage D1 prostate cancer were given suramin on a pharmacokinetically derived dosing schedule to maintain suramin concentrations between 175 and 300 micrograms/mL. Additionally, all patients received flutamide 250 mg orally three times daily, initiated on day 1 and continued until disease progression; depot leuprolide 7.5 mg intramuscularly begun on day 5 and repeated every 4 weeks indefinitely; and replacement doses of hydrocortisone.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were entered onto the study: 48 with stage D2 and two with stage D1 disease. The median age was 59 years (range, 42 to 79) and 31 patients had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 100%. Forty-five patients had bone metastases and 25 had measurable soft tissue disease. Forty-one (82%) had severe disease. The overall response rate in 49 assessable patients was three complete responses (CRs) and 30 partial responses (PRs) for an overall response rate of 67%. Eighteen patients have died. The median survival time has not been reached, with a median potential follow-up duration of 44 months. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was seen in 38% of patients and was predominantly hematologic and reversible.
CONCLUSION: The high response rate and prolonged survival in a poor-prognosis group of patients with metastatic prostate cancer warrant a phase III randomized comparison of this regimen versus hormonal therapy alone. Toxicity was moderate and reversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193342     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  100 Years of Suramin.

Authors:  Natalie Wiedemar; Dennis A Hauser; Pascal Mäser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Suramin/epidoxorubicin association in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: preliminary results of a pilot phase II study.

Authors:  L Miglietta; L Canobbio; C Granetto; M O Vannozzi; M Esposito; F Boccardo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Effect of SLCO1B3 haplotype on testosterone transport and clinical outcome in caucasian patients with androgen-independent prostatic cancer.

Authors:  Akinobu Hamada; Tristan Sissung; Douglas K Price; Romano Danesi; Cindy H Chau; Nima Sharifi; David Venzon; Kenji Maeda; Keisuke Nagao; Alex Sparreboom; Hiroaki Mitsuya; William L Dahut; William D Figg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Suramin's development: what did we learn?

Authors:  Maninderjeet Kaur; Eddie Reed; Oliver Sartor; William Dahut; William D Figg
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.651

6.  Suramin-Induced Neurotoxicity: Preclinical Models and Neuroprotective Strategies.

Authors:  David von der Ahe; Petra Huehnchen; Mustafa Balkaya; Sarah Peruzzaro; Matthias Endres; Wolfgang Boehmerle
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.