Literature DB >> 9258544

Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention.

S Nelsing1, T L Nielsen, J O Nielsen.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms of percutaneous blood exposure (PCE) among doctors and discuss rational strategies for prevention. Data were obtained as part of a nation-wide questionnaire survey of occupational blood exposure among hospital employed doctors in Denmark. The doctors were asked to describe their most recent PCE, if any, within the previous 3 months. Detailed information on the instruments, procedures, circumstances and mechanisms that caused the PCE was obtained. Of 9375 doctors, 6256 (67%) responded, and 6005 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Of 971 described PCE the majority were caused by suture needles (n = 483), i.v.-catheter-stylets (n = 94), injection needles (n = 75), phlebotomy needles (n = 53), scalpels (n = 45), arterial blood sample needles (n = 41) and bone fragments (n = 23). Inattentiveness was the most common cause, contributing to 30.5% of all PCE. Use of fingers rather than instruments was a major cause of injury in surgical specialities and was a contributing cause of 36.9% PCE on suture needles. Common contributing causes when fingers were used (n = 199) were poor space in (30.2%) or view of (18.6%) the operation field. It was often argued that instruments were not practical to use or might harm the tissue. Of 689 PCE in surgical specialties, 17.4% were inflicted by colleagues. Up to 53.3% of PCE on hollow-bore needles could be attributed to unsafe routines like recapping only, but other mechanisms like sudden patient movements and 'acute situation' were common, especially in the case of PCE on i.v.-catheter-stylets. It is concluded that the exposure mechanisms of PCE reflect both unsafe routines, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. Education in safer working routines are needed in all specialties. Introduction of safer devices should have a high priority in surgical specialties, and should be considered in non-surgical specialties too.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258544     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007369016717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  29 in total

1.  The effectiveness of double-gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology.

Authors:  P M Doyle; S Alvi; R Johanson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-01

2.  Guidelines for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus to health-care and public-safety workers.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  1989-06-23

Review 3.  Universal precautions and safety devices which reduce the risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens: a review for emergency health care workers.

Authors:  L R Friedland
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.454

4.  A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers.

Authors:  D J Haiduven; T M DeMaio; D A Stevens
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  1987-08-21

6.  Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures.

Authors:  J I Tokars; D M Bell; D H Culver; R Marcus; M H Mendelson; E P Sloan; B F Farber; D Fligner; M E Chamberland; P S McKibben
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Subcuticular skin closure using a 'blunt' needle.

Authors:  S S Miller; A Sabharwal
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Fine-needle aspiration anchor. A simple device to prevent needle-stick injury at fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  W Y Tsang; J K Chan; S K Chan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Efficacy of glove combinations in reducing cell culture infection after glove puncture with needles contaminated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  G K Johnson; T Nolan; H C Wuh; W S Robinson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.

Authors:  G Ippolito; G De Carli; V Puro; N Petrosillo; C Arici; R Bertucci; L Bianciardi; L Bonazzi; A Cestrone; M Daglio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Aug 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital.

Authors:  Sabine Wicker; Juliane Jung; Regina Allwinn; René Gottschalk; Holger F Rabenau
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Are we putting ourselves in danger? Occupational hazards and job safety for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Robert C Ryu; Phillip H Behrens; Azeem T Malik; Jonathan D Lester; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-20

3.  The Prevalence of Accidental Needle Stick Injury and their Reporting among Healthcare Workers in Orthopaedic Wards in General Hospital Melaka, Malaysia.

Authors:  A Bhardwaj; N Sivapathasundaram; Mf Yusof; Ah Minghat; Kmm Swe; Nk Sinha
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2014-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.