Literature DB >> 1583758

Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures.

J I Tokars1, D M Bell, D H Culver, R Marcus, M H Mendelson, E P Sloan, B F Farber, D Fligner, M E Chamberland, P S McKibben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the numbers and circumstances of percutaneous injuries (eg, needle sticks, cuts) that occur during surgical procedures. Surgical personnel risk infection with blood-borne pathogens from percutaneous injuries; some injuries might also place patients at risk by exposing them to a health care worker's blood.
DESIGN: Observers present at 1382 surgical procedures recorded information about the procedure, the personnel present, and percutaneous injuries that occurred.
SETTING: Four US teaching hospitals during 1990. PARTICIPANTS: Operating room personnel in five surgical specialties. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and circumstances of percutaneous injuries among surgical personnel and instances in which surgical instruments that had injured a worker recontacted the patient's surgical wound.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine injuries occurred during 95 (6.9%) of the 1382 procedures. Seventy-six injuries (77%) were caused by suture needles and affected the nondominant hand (62 injuries [63%]), especially the distal forefinger. The risk of injury adjusted for confounding variables by logistic regression was higher during vaginal hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 7.5) and lower during certain orthopedic procedures (OR, 0.2; CI, 0.1 to 0.7) than during 11 other types of procedures (reference group; OR, 1.0). Use of fingers rather than an instrument to hold the tissue being sutured was associated with 35 injuries (35%). Eighty-eight injuries (89%) were sustained by resident or attending surgeons; in 28 (32%) of the 88 injuries in surgeons, the sharp object that caused the injury recontacted the patient.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous injuries occur regularly during surgery, placing surgical personnel and, to a lesser extent, patients at risk for infection with blood-borne pathogens. Many such injuries may be preventable with changes in devices, techniques, or protective equipment; all such measures require careful evaluation to determine their efficacy in reducing injury and their effect on patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing operating theatre injuries.

Authors:  B Stringer; C Infante-Rivard; J A Hanley
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Novel devices for wound closure in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Sidney Regalado; Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings.

Authors:  Emily R M Sydnor; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Incidence and risk factors of occupational blood exposure: a nation-wide survey among Danish doctors.

Authors:  S Nelsing; T L Nielsen; H Brønnum-Hansen; J O Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  S Nelsing; T L Nielsen; J O Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Sharps-handling practices among junior surgical residents: a video analysis.

Authors:  David Tso; Monica Langer; Geoff K Blair; Sonia Butterworth
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in healthcare workers.

Authors:  Nicola Coppola; Stefania De Pascalis; Lorenzo Onorato; Federica Calò; Caterina Sagnelli; Evangelista Sagnelli
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-18

8.  Is there a benefit to a routine preoperative screening of infectivity for HIV, hepatitis B and C virus before elective orthopaedic operations?

Authors:  P Weber; J Eberle; J R Bogner; F Schrimpf; V Jansson; S Huber-Wagner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Kerr; Nicola Stewart; Alistair Pace; Sherief Elsayed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Barriers to the reporting and management of needlestick injuries among surgeons.

Authors:  R Kennedy; S Kelly; S Gonsalves; P A Mc Cann
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.