Literature DB >> 9256887

CEA, CA 19-9, and CA-50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma.

D Pectasides1, A Mylonakis, M Kostopoulou, M Papadopoulou, D Triantafillis, J Varthalitis, M Dimitriades, A Athanassiou.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA-50 in the diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of 62 gastric carcinoma patients having either adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy. Patients were divided in two groups: group A included patients treated on an adjuvant basis following a curative resection of gastric cancer, and group B included patients with residual disease post surgery or patients with inoperable tumor or generalized disease. Serum marker levels were measured in a prospective study just before the initiation of chemotherapy and before each course during chemotherapy. In group A, CEA was positive in 2/25 (8%) patients, CA 19-9 in 1/25 (4%), and CA-50 in 1/25 (4%). In group B the sensitivity of CEA was 48.6% (18/37 patients), of CA 19-9 64.9% (27/37 patients), and of CA-50 70.3% (26/37) patients. There was a significant correlation between the CA 19-9 and CA-50 levels in both groups. No correlation was found between the sensitivity or the absolute initial marker levels and the tumor's differentiation or extent of disease. In group A the only patient with initially elevated CA 19-9 and CA-50 values relapsed early while he was on adjuvant chemotherapy. It was also found that the rising final CA 19-9 and CA-50 values at the end of chemotherapy were correlated with an increased incidence of relapse, but not with the disease-free interval. In group B the initially low marker levels showed a trend to predict a favorable outcome of treatment. There was no statistically significant correlation between the marker titers before each course and response to chemotherapy. It is concluded that the comeasurement of CA 19-9 and CA-50, and to some degree of CEA, is justifiable for gastric cancer. The estimation of CA 19-9 and CA-50 may be useful for early detection of recurrence after curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. In advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the estimation of either CA 19-9 or CA-50 and CEA serum values may help in checking the prognosis, determining the efficacy of palliative treatment modalities, and recognizing recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256887     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199708000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  27 in total

1.  Methylation status of TRAF2 is associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Wei-Jie Dai; Xiao-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Decreased expression of Bauhinia purpurea lectin is a predictor of gastric cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Takuro Futsukaichi; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Kentaro Nakajima; Tsutomu Daa; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Normal carcinoembryonic antigen indicates benefit from perioperative chemotherapy to gastric carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen; Yuan-Fang Li; Xing-Yu Feng; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Xiu-Hong Yuan; Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Preoperative CA 125 is significant indicator of curative resection in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Dae Hoon Kim; Hyo Yung Yun; Dong Hee Ryu; Hye-Suk Han; Joung-Ho Han; Soon Man Yoon; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The diagnostic value of monoclonal gastric cancer 7 antigen: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zongyue Zeng; Sheng Fu; Ping Hu; Liuyang Zhao; Hailong Zhang; Xi Tang; Xiaorong Yang; Zhaofang Zeng
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Clinical significance of ECT2 expression in tissue and serum of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  H-B Wang; H-C Yan; Y Liu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Exploring the role of molecular biomarkers as a potential weapon against gastric cancer: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Marwa Matboli; Sarah El-Nakeep; Nourhan Hossam; Alaa Habieb; Ahmed E M Azazy; Ali E Ebrahim; Ziad Nagy; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Clinicopathological characteristics in the differential diagnosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Jiann-Sheng Su; Yu-Tso Chen; Ren-Ching Wang; Chun-Ying Wu; Shou-Wu Lee; Teng-Yu Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Nesfatin-1 is a potential diagnostic biomarker for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Wang; Yan Zheng; Pei-Fei Fang; Xian-Bing Song
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Tamaki Noie; Manabu Ohashi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.