G K Fox1, S C Bowden, G M Bashford, D S Smith. 1. Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine driving competence in a group of drivers diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in terms of a standardized open road evaluation and expert judgments. To examine the validity of a standardized medical examination, including administration of the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE), and a standardized neuropsychological assessment as predictors of open road driving performance. DESIGN: A prospective investigation with consecutively referred subjects. SETTING: Coorabel Driver Assessment Centre, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen subjects with a diagnosis of probable AD. MEASUREMENTS: A standardized clinical medical examination, a standardized neuropsychological assessment, and a standardized open road driving evaluation. The driving evaluation provided a correct driving actions score. The outcome measure was the expert judges' rating of overall driving competence, which was termed the final on-road result. RESULTS: Seven subjects passed the on-road driving evaluation, and 12 failed. MMSE was found to be a significant predictor of final on-road result. The physician's prediction, the neuropsychology test scores, and the neuropsychologist's prediction were not found to be significantly associated with the final on-road result. The on-road driving evaluation was a reliable test. CONCLUSION: Inasmuch as all subjects except one were still driving and all wished to continue to drive, it is important to note that 63.2% of subjects failed the on-road evaluation. Conversely, 36.8% were judged safe to drive, suggesting that AD diagnosis alone may be insufficient criteria for cessation of driving. A standardized road test may be the only appropriate means of determining driving competence in people diagnosed with AD.
OBJECTIVES: To examine driving competence in a group of drivers diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in terms of a standardized open road evaluation and expert judgments. To examine the validity of a standardized medical examination, including administration of the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE), and a standardized neuropsychological assessment as predictors of open road driving performance. DESIGN: A prospective investigation with consecutively referred subjects. SETTING: Coorabel Driver Assessment Centre, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen subjects with a diagnosis of probable AD. MEASUREMENTS: A standardized clinical medical examination, a standardized neuropsychological assessment, and a standardized open road driving evaluation. The driving evaluation provided a correct driving actions score. The outcome measure was the expert judges' rating of overall driving competence, which was termed the final on-road result. RESULTS: Seven subjects passed the on-road driving evaluation, and 12 failed. MMSE was found to be a significant predictor of final on-road result. The physician's prediction, the neuropsychology test scores, and the neuropsychologist's prediction were not found to be significantly associated with the final on-road result. The on-road driving evaluation was a reliable test. CONCLUSION: Inasmuch as all subjects except one were still driving and all wished to continue to drive, it is important to note that 63.2% of subjects failed the on-road evaluation. Conversely, 36.8% were judged safe to drive, suggesting that AD diagnosis alone may be insufficient criteria for cessation of driving. A standardized road test may be the only appropriate means of determining driving competence in people diagnosed with AD.
Authors: Laura B Brown; Brian R Ott; George D Papandonatos; Yunxia Sui; Rebecca E Ready; John C Morris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laura B Brown; Robert A Stern; Deborah A Cahn-Weiner; Brooke Rogers; Melissa A Messer; Margaret C Lannon; Charleen Maxwell; Timothy Souza; Travis White; Brian R Ott Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Ganesh M Babulal; Sarah H Stout; Monique M Williams; Ganesh Rajasekar; Annie Harmon; Jonathon Vivoda; Megan Zuelsdorff; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris; Beau Ances; Catherine M Roe Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2019-11-04
Authors: Brian R Ott; David Anthony; George D Papandonatos; Anelyssa D'Abreu; Jeffrey Burock; Alicia Curtin; Chuang-Kuo Wu; John C Morris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.562