Literature DB >> 9256817

Death and reputation: how consumers acted upon HCFA mortality information.

S T Mennemeyer1, M A Morrisey, L Z Howard.   

Abstract

From 1986 through 1992, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) released information comparing patient death rates at individual hospitals. This was viewed widely as an effort to aid consumers in selecting hospitals. This study evaluates how the release of this information affected hospital utilization, as measured by discharges. It finds a very small, but statistically significant effect of the HCFA data release. A hospital with an actual death rate twice that expected by HCFA had fewer than one less discharge per week in the first year. However, press reports of single, unexpected deaths were associated with an average 9% reduction in hospital discharges within one year. HCFA was justified in eliminating its mortality report, not because it was being used by consumers to choose hospitals, but because it was not. Implications for report cards are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  10 in total

1.  Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

2.  Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.

Authors:  E C Schneider; T Lieberman
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

3.  Do report cards influence hospital choice? The case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 4.  Overview of issues in improving quality of care for children.

Authors:  E A McGlynn; N Halfon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Patients' experience of choosing an outpatient clinic in one county in Denmark: results of a patient survey.

Authors:  Hans O Birk; Rikke Gut; Lars O Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Where would you go for your next hospitalization?

Authors:  Kyoungrae Jung; Roger Feldman; Dennis Scanlon
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.804

9.  Quality-based ratings in Medicare and trends in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.734

10.  Hospital Choice for Cataract Treatments: The Winner Takes Most.

Authors:  Suzanne Ruwaard; Rudy C M H Douven
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-12-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.