Literature DB >> 9255815

Clinical refraction in three-dimensional dioptric space revisited.

T Raasch1.   

Abstract

The traditional clinical designation of spherocylindrical power unambiguously specifies the refractive properties of a thin lens or refractive surface. This representation of dioptric power is not, however, optimum in mathematical terms, as is apparent when, for example, two spherocylindrical lens powers are added. Alternative systems have been described which are not subject to this same type of difficulty, and the essential feature of these other systems is that spherocylindrical power is defined in terms of a three-dimensional dioptric space in which the axes are usually orthogonal. The advantages of this orthogonality can be exploited in the practice of clinical refraction, provided lens powers in these three dimensions can be physically implemented. Systems using these characteristics have been introduced in the past, but the clinical community has not adopted them on a widespread basis. However, systems which take advantages of these features do have unique advantages relative to traditional clinical refraction procedures. These characteristics, and refractive procedures which exploit their advantages, are described.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9255815     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199706000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  5 in total

Review 1.  Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction.

Authors:  N Morlet; D Minassian; J Dart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Combined anterior segment OCT and wavefront-based autorefractor using a shared beam.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; Giulia Belloni; Yu-Cherng Chang; Heather Durkee; Ettore Masetti; Florence Cabot; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  The evaluation of a web-based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: A method comparison study.

Authors:  Marc B Muijzer; Janneau L J Claessens; Francesco Cassano; Daniel A Godefrooij; Yves F D M Prevoo; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Marc B Muijzer; Francesco Cassano; Daniel A Godefrooij; Yves F D M Prevoo; Nienke Soeters
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Dioptric power and refractive behaviour: a review of methods and applications.

Authors:  Alan Rubin; Tanya Evans; Nabeela Hasrod
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.