Literature DB >> 9255189

Tanner-Whitehouse bone age reference values for North American children.

J Tanner1, D Oshman, F Bahhage, M Healy.   

Abstract

On the basis of 1090 x-ray films from 225 boys and 225 girls ages 8 to 16 years-participants in the Project Heartbeat longitudinal study who were living in a generally above-average income environment near Houston, Tex.-we provide Tanner-Whitehouse Mark 2 RUS (radius, ulna, and selected metacarpals and phalanges) bone age reference values for North American children of European origin. We designate these values as US90 (for the 1990s) reference values, in contrast to the original British bone age standards, called UK60 (for the 1960s). The US90 children matured considerably earlier than those on which the UK60 standards were based, though only about 3 months earlier than contemporary Spanish children. A study of 190 x-ray films from a research longitudinal series of 23 healthy boys in Virginia yielded values very close to the Houston values, confirming that our US90 reference values should be used in North America, pending a more extensive survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9255189     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)90000-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  17 in total

1.  TW2 and TW3 bone ages: time to change?

Authors:  M Lynn Ahmed; Justin T Warner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Skeletal age determination of the hand: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S Schmidt; I Nitz; S Ribbecke; R Schulz; H Pfeiffer; A Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Can the Greulich and Pyle method be used on French contemporary individuals?

Authors:  Donca Zabet; Camille Rérolle; Julien Pucheux; Norbert Telmon; Pauline Saint-Martin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Tanner-Whitehouse Skeletal Ages in Male Youth Soccer Players: TW2 or TW3?

Authors:  Robert M Malina; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; António J Figueiredo; Renaat M Philippaerts; Norikazu Hirose; Maria Eugenia Peña Reyes; Giulio Gilli; Andrea Benso; Roel Vaeyens; Dieter Deprez; Luiz G A Guglielmo; Rojapon Buranarugsa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Bone age assessment with conventional ultrasonography in healthy infants from 1 to 24 months of age.

Authors:  Monica Daneff; Claudia Casalis; Claudio H Bruno; Didier A Bruno
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09

6.  Management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents; which factors define the response to treatment?

Authors:  Ayfer Alikasifoglu; Nur Berna Celik; Zeynep Alev Ozon; Elmas Nazli Gonc; Nurgun Kandemir
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics.

Authors:  Sven Schmidt; Inna Nitz; Ronald Schulz; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 8.  Growth, body composition and hormonal axes in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A D Rogol
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Normal and Premature Adrenarche.

Authors:  Robert L Rosenfield
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Evaluation of the Artificial Neural Network and Naive Bayes Models Trained with Vertebra Ratios for Growth and Development Determination.

Authors:  Hatice Kök; Mehmet Said İzgi; Ayşe Merve Acılar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.