Literature DB >> 18458930

Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics.

Sven Schmidt1, Inna Nitz, Ronald Schulz, Andreas Schmeling.   

Abstract

The present paper analyses the applicability of the clinically prevalent skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age estimation in living individuals. For this purpose, the hand X-rays from 48 boys and 44 girls aged 12-16 years were evaluated retrospectively. The minima and maxima, the mean values with their standard deviations as well as the medians with upper and lower quartiles, are presented for the skeletal ages 12-16 years estimated by the TW2 and TW3 methods. In the legally relevant skeletal age group 14-16 years, the differences between the skeletal age and the mean value of the chronological age were between -0.1 and +1.4 years for the TW2 method. For the TW3 method, the differences between the skeletal age and the mean value of the chronological age were between -0.4 and +0.2 years in the relevant age group. Due to the risk of serious overestimations, the TW2 method seems to be unsuitable for forensic age diagnostics. The application of the TW3 method for forensic age estimations can be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458930     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0237-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  35 in total

1.  Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods.

Authors:  R K Bull; P D Edwards; P M Kemp; S Fry; I A Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations.

Authors:  A Schmeling; W Reisinger; D Loreck; K Vendura; W Markus; G Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  A method of assessing skeletal maturity from radiographs; a report from the Oxford child health survey.

Authors:  R M ACHESON
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1954-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  TW2 and TW3 bone ages: time to change?

Authors:  M Lynn Ahmed; Justin T Warner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Assessing skeletal maturity by inspection and bone-specific methods with the atlas of greulich & pyle.

Authors:  W D Low
Journal:  Z Morphol Anthropol       Date:  1975

6.  Bone age estimation: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A J Cole; L Webb; T J Cole
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods.

Authors:  D G King; D M Steventon; M P O'Sullivan; A M Cook; V P Hornsby; I G Jefferson; P R King
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Estimation of pediatric skeletal age using geometric morphometrics and three-dimensional cranial size changes.

Authors:  José Braga; Jacques Treil
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Skeletal maturation in adolescence: a comparison between the Tanner-Whitehouse II and the Fels method.

Authors:  F J van Lenthe; H C Kemper; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification.

Authors:  Sven Schmidt; Matthias Mühler; Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Ronald Schulz
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.791

View more
  17 in total

1.  Dental age diagnostics by means of radiographical evaluation of the growth stages of lower wisdom teeth.

Authors:  B Knell; P Ruhstaller; F Prieels; A Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Effectiveness of Bang and Ramm's formulae in age assessment of Indians from dentin translucency length.

Authors:  Ashith B Acharya; S Vimi
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Forensic age estimation in living subjects based on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis as revealed by thin-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Manuel Kellinghaus; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Sex determination using discriminant function analysis in children and adolescents: a lateral cephalometric study.

Authors:  Tin-Hsin Hsiao; Shih-Meng Tsai; Szu-Ting Chou; Jing-Yun Pan; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Hong-Po Chang; Hong-Sen Chen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  The digital atlas of skeletal maturity by Gilsanz and Ratib: a suitable alternative for age estimation of living individuals in criminal proceedings?

Authors:  Sven Schmidt; Inna Nitz; Ronald Schulz; Michael Tsokos; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Chronological age estimation of third molar mineralization of Han in southern China.

Authors:  Dong Lin Zeng; Zhi Ling Wu; Min Yi Cui
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Dental age estimation in Spanish and Venezuelan children. Comparison of Demirjian and Chaillet's scores.

Authors:  Angelines Cruz-Landeira; Jesabeth Linares-Argote; María Martínez-Rodríguez; María Sol Rodríguez-Calvo; Xosé Luis Otero; Luis Concheiro
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Accuracy of MRI skeletal age estimation for subjects 12-19. Potential use for subjects of unknown age.

Authors:  Serenella Serinelli; Valeria Panebianco; Milvia Martino; Sofia Battisti; Karina Rodacki; Enrico Marinelli; Fulvio Zaccagna; Richard C Semelka; Ernesto Tomei
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Skeletal age determination of the hand: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S Schmidt; I Nitz; S Ribbecke; R Schulz; H Pfeiffer; A Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Radiographic analysis of epiphyseal fusion at knee joint to assess likelihood of having attained 18 years of age.

Authors:  R Cameriere; M Cingolani; A Giuliodori; S De Luca; L Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.