Literature DB >> 9254957

The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth.

B M Eley1.   

Abstract

This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9254957     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  4 in total

1.  Effect of filler size and morphology on viscoelastic stability of resin-composites under dynamic loading.

Authors:  Muhammad Kaleem; Julian D Satterthwaite; David C Watts
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Assessment of exposures and potential risks to the US adult population from wear (attrition and abrasion) of gold and ceramic dental restorations.

Authors:  G Mark Richardson; Scott R Clemow; Rachel E Peters; Kyle J James; Steven D Siciliano
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Sonia K Makhija; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 4.  Advances in Nanotechnology for Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Zafar; Saad Qasim; Sana Shahab; Mustafa Naseem; Ammar AbuReqaiba
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.