Literature DB >> 9254860

Deletions in Xq26.3-q27.3 including FMR1 result in a severe phenotype in a male and variable phenotypes in females depending upon the X inactivation pattern.

D J Wolff1, K M Gustashaw, V Zurcher, L Ko, W White, L Weiss, D L Van Dyke, S Schwartz, H F Willard.   

Abstract

High resolution cytogenetics, microsatellite marker analyses, and fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to define Xq deletions encompassing the fragile X gene, FMR1, detected in individuals from two unrelated families. In Family 1, a 19-year-old male had facial features consistent with fragile X syndrome; however, his profound mental and growth retardation, small testes, and lover limb skeletal defects and contractures demonstrated a more severe phenotype, suggestive of a contiguous gene syndrome. A cytogenetic deletion including Xq26.3-q27.3 was observed in the proband, his phenotypically normal mother, and his learning-disabled non-dysmorphic sister. Methylation analyses at the FMR1 and androgen receptor loci indicated that the deleted X was inactive in > 95% of his mother's white blood cells and 80-85% of the sister's leukocytes. The proximal breakpoint for the deletion was approximately 10 Mb centromeric to FMR1, and the distal breakpoint mapped 1 Mb distal to FMR1. This deletion, encompassing approximately 13 Mb of DNA, is the largest deletion including FMR1 reported to date. In the second family, a slightly smaller deletion was detected. A female with moderate to severe mental retardation, seizures, and hypothyroidism, had a de novo cytogenetic deletion extending from Xq26.3 to q27.3, which removed approximately 12 Mb of DNA around the FMR1 gene. Cytogenetic, and molecular data revealed that approximately 50% of her white blood cells contained an active deleted X. These findings indicate that males with deletions including Xq26.3-q27.3 may exhibit a more severe phenotype than typical fragile X males, and females with similar deletions may have an abnormal phenotype if the deleted X remains active in a significant proportion of the cells. Thus, important genes for intellectual and neurological development, in addition to FMR1, may reside in Xq26.3-q27.3. One candidate gene in this region, SOX3, is thought to be involved in neuronal development and its loss may partly explain the more severe phenotypes of our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9254860     DOI: 10.1007/s004390050501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  15 in total

Review 1.  Mutation spectra in fragile X syndrome induced by deletions of CGG*CCG repeats.

Authors:  Robert D Wells
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Small genomic rearrangements involving FMR1 support the importance of its gene dosage for normal neurocognitive function.

Authors:  Sandesh C S Nagamani; Ayelet Erez; Frank J Probst; Patricia Bader; Patricia Evans; Linda A Baker; Ping Fang; Terry Bertin; Patricia Hixson; Pawel Stankiewicz; David Nelson; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.660

3.  Microdeletions including FMR1 in three female patients with intellectual disability - further delineation of the phenotype and expression studies.

Authors:  A M Zink; E Wohlleber; H Engels; O K Rødningen; K Ravn; S Heilmann; J Rehnitz; N Katzorke; C Kraus; S Blichfeldt; P Hoffmann; H Reutter; F F Brockschmidt; M Kreiß-Nachtsheim; P H Vogt; T E Prescott; Z Tümer; J A Lee
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2014-01-29

4.  De Novo Large Deletion Leading to Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Poonnada Jiraanont; Esther Manor; Nazi Tabatadze; Marwa Zafarullah; Guadalupe Mendoza; Gia Melikishvili; Flora Tassone
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin Em Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Femke At de Vries; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Merel C de Wit; Attie Tji Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Mosaic FMR1 deletion causes fragile X syndrome and can lead to molecular misdiagnosis: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bradford Coffee; Morna Ikeda; Dejan B Budimirovic; Lawrence N Hjelm; Walter E Kaufmann; Stephen T Warren
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 7.  The fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  B B de Vries; D J Halley; B A Oostra; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from a Female Patient with a Xq27.3-q28 Deletion to Establish Disease Models and Identify Therapies.

Authors:  Noriko Watanabe; Kohei Kitada; Katherine E Santostefano; Airi Yokoyama; Sara M Waldrop; Coy D Heldermon; Daisuke Tachibana; Masayasu Koyama; Amy M Meacham; Christina A Pacak; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Structural Chromosome Abnormalities Associated with Obesity: Report of Four New subjects and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Majed J Dasouki; Erin L Youngs; Karine Hovanes
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Congenital hydrocephalus and abnormal subcommissural organ development in Sox3 transgenic mice.

Authors:  Kristie Lee; Jacqueline Tan; Michael B Morris; Karine Rizzoti; James Hughes; Pike See Cheah; Fernando Felquer; Xuan Liu; Sandra Piltz; Robin Lovell-Badge; Paul Q Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.