Literature DB >> 9254739

Radioprotection against the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in cellular DNA but not native cellular chromatin by the polyamine spermine.

S Chiu1, N L Oleinick.   

Abstract

The complexing of histones with DNA and the resulting condensation of chromatin protect mammalian cell DNA from radiation-induced strand breakage. In recent studies of SV40 DNA and minichromosomes, marked radioprotection was afforded by spermine through polyamine-induced compaction and aggregation (Newton et al., Radiat. Res. 145, 776-780, 1996). To evaluate the contribution of polyamines to the radioprotection of cellular chromatin, intact V79 cells, nuclei (native chromatin) and chromatin that was partially or completely stripped of histones were treated with spermine or putrescine and gamma-irradiated while embedded in agarose plugs, and induction of double-strand breaks was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In the absence of added spermine, the order of radiosensitivity was: dehistonized chromatin (DNA loops anchored to the nuclear matrix) > chromatin depleted of histone H1 > chromatin partially depleted of histone H1 > native chromatin > intact cells. Spermine at concentrations below 1 mM was without effect on strand breakage in any of the preparations, except for limited radioprotection of H1-depleted chromatin. Increasing radioprotection with increasing concentration (1-10 mM) was provided to dehistonized chromatin by spermine but not by putrescine, a polyamine that does not compact DNA or chromatin. Significant radioprotection by spermine was also found for H1-depleted relaxed chromatin at concentrations > or = 1 mM. In contrast, no radioprotection by spermine (up to 10 mM) was observed for any of the chromatin preparations containing all histones. These observations support the hypothesis proposed by Newton et al. that spermine protects DNA against radiation damage via polyamine-induced compaction and aggregation. With removal of histone H1, the exposed chromatin develops the ability to be protected by spermine. However, the absence of radioprotection of native chromatin by spermine is consistent with a role for histones as the major radioprotectors of cellular DNA and the differential radiosensitivity of decondensed compared to condensed cellular chromatin resulting from the effects of factors other than polyamines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9254739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  7 in total

Review 1.  Modifying radiation damage.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; William H McBride
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Radiation protection following nuclear power accidents: a survey of putative mechanisms involved in the radioprotective actions of taurine during and after radiation exposure.

Authors:  Olav Albert Christophersen
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2012-02-01

3.  Nuclear condensation and free radical scavenging: a dual mechanism of bisbenzimidazoles to modulate radiation damage to DNA.

Authors:  Urmila Tawar; Sandhya Bansal; Shiteshu Shrimal; Manish Singh; Vibha Tandon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Protection of DNA against direct radiation damage by complex formation with positively charged polypeptides.

Authors:  Marina Roginskaya; William A Bernhard; Yuriy Razskazovskiy
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Cell proliferative activity estimated by histone H2B mRNA level correlates with cytogenetic damage induced by radiation in human glioblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Jerzy Slowinski; Urszula Mazurek; Grazyna Bierzynska-Macyszyn; Maria Widel; Malgorzata Latocha; Joanna Glogowska-Ligus; Monika Stomal; Ryszard Mrowka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Modulation of chromatin organization by RH-3, a preparation of Hippophae rhamnoides, a possible role in radioprotection.

Authors:  I Prem Kumar; Samanta Namita; H C Goel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.396

7.  Mapping of oxidative stress responses of human tumor cells following photodynamic therapy using hexaminolevulinate.

Authors:  Lina Cekaite; Qian Peng; Andrew Reiner; Susan Shahzidi; Siri Tveito; Ingegerd E Furre; Eivind Hovig
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.