Literature DB >> 9253764

Membrane insertion: The strategies of toxins (review).

C Lesieur1, B Vécsey-Semjén, L Abrami, M Fivaz, F Gisou van der Goot.   

Abstract

Protein toxins are soluble molecules secreted by pathogenic bacteria which act at the plasma membrane or in the cytoplasm of target cells. They must therefore interact with a membrane at some point, either to modify its permeability properties or to reach the cytoplasm. As a consequence, toxins have the built-in capacity to adopt two generally incompatible states: water-soluble and transmembrane. Irrespective of their origin or function, the membrane interacting domain of most protein toxins seems to have adopted one out of two structural strategies to be able to undergo this metamorphosis. In the first group of toxins the membrane interacting domain has the structural characteristics of most known membrane proteins, i.e. it contains hydrophobic and amphipathic alpha-helices long enough to span a membrane. To render this 'membrane protein' water-soluble during the initial part of its life the hydrophobic helices are sheltered from the solvent by a barrel of amphipathic helices. In the second group of toxins the opposite strategy is adopted. The toxin is an intrinsically soluble protein and is composed mainly of beta-structure. These toxins manage to become membrane proteins by oligomerizing in order to combine amphipathic beta-sheet to generate sufficient hydrophobicity for membrane insertion to occur. Toxins from this latter group are thought to perforate the lipid bilayer as a beta-barrel such as has been described for bacterial porins, and has recently been shown for staphylococcal alpha-toxin. The two groups of toxins will be described in detail through the presentation of examples. Particular attention will be given to the beta-structure toxins, since four new structures have been solved over the past year: the staphyloccocal alpha-toxin channel, the anthrax protective antigen protoxin, the anthrax protective antigen-soluble heptamer and the CytB protoxin. Structural similarities with mammalian proteins implicated in the immune response and apoptosis will be discussed. Peptide toxins will not be covered in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9253764     DOI: 10.3109/09687689709068435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Membr Biol        ISSN: 0968-7688            Impact factor:   2.857


  34 in total

1.  Retrieving biological activity from LukF-PV mutants combined with different S components implies compatibility between the stem domains of these staphylococcal bicomponent leucotoxins.

Authors:  S Werner; D A Colin; M Coraiola; G Menestrina; H Monteil; G Prévost
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Structure of the reovirus membrane-penetration protein, Mu1, in a complex with is protector protein, Sigma3.

Authors:  Susanne Liemann; Kartik Chandran; Timothy S Baker; Max L Nibert; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Structure-function studies of tryptophan mutants of equinatoxin II, a sea anemone pore-forming protein.

Authors:  P Malovrh; A Barlic; Z Podlesek; P MaCek; G Menestrina; G Anderluh
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease.

Authors:  Kai Simons; Robert Ehehalt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Pore-forming toxins: ancient, but never really out of fashion.

Authors:  Matteo Dal Peraro; F Gisou van der Goot
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Acid destabilization of the solution conformation of Bcl-xL does not drive its pH-dependent insertion into membranes.

Authors:  Guruvasuthevan R Thuduppathy; R Blake Hill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  The cytotoxic fimbrial structural subunit of Xenorhabdus nematophila is a pore-forming toxin.

Authors:  Jyotirmoy Banerjee; Jitendra Singh; Mohan Chandra Joshi; Shubhendu Ghosh; Nirupama Banerjee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Membrane insertion of a Tc toxin in near-atomic detail.

Authors:  Christos Gatsogiannis; Felipe Merino; Daniel Prumbaum; Daniel Roderer; Franziska Leidreiter; Dominic Meusch; Stefan Raunser
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Evidence that membrane insertion of the cytosolic domain of Bcl-xL is governed by an electrostatic mechanism.

Authors:  Guruvasuthevan R Thuduppathy; Jeffrey W Craig; Victoria Kholodenko; Arne Schon; R Blake Hill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins.

Authors:  E Schnepf; N Crickmore; J Van Rie; D Lereclus; J Baum; J Feitelson; D R Zeigler; D H Dean
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.