Literature DB >> 9253093

Anterior cervical pseudarthrosis. Natural history and treatment.

F M Phillips1, G Carlson, S E Emery, H H Bohlman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of long-term clinical outcomes in 48 patients with pseudarthroses after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the natural history, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in a large population with documented pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent reports suggest that pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion adversely affects clinical outcome. Little data regarding cervical pseudarthroses have been published, and conclusions have been drawn from reports with small patient populations and short-term follow-up periods.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients with radiographically documented pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were studied. Patients were examined and radiographs made at regular intervals (mean follow-up, 66 months). Clinical results were based on patients' assessment of pain, prescription drug use, activity level and Odom's criteria. Clinical outcomes in patients who underwent surgical repair of the pseudarthrosis are reported.
RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 32 (67%) with pseudarthroses were symptomatic at latest follow-up or at the time of further surgery. Of the 32 patients, 9 had a symptom-free period of at least 2 years after the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion before redeveloping cervical symptoms after a traumatic episode. Of 48 patients with pseudarthroses, 16 (33%) remained asymptomatic at a mean of 5.1 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A younger age at the time of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion increased the likelihood of the pseudarthrosis becoming symptomatic. After multiple level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, the caudal-most operated level accounted for 82% of the pseudarthroses. Sixteen patients had an anterior repair of the pseudarthrosis, and fusion was achieved in 14. Six patients underwent posterior pseudarthrosis repair, and all healed. In patients in whom fusion was achieved with a second cervical operation, the results were excellent in 19 and good in 1.
CONCLUSION: A pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is frequently associated with a poor clinical outcome. Surgical repair of the pseudarthrosis with an anterior or posterior approach seems to have a high likelihood of a successful clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9253093     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Load sharing mechanism across graft-bone interface in static cervical locking plate fixation.

Authors:  In Ho Han; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Byung Ho Jin; Yong Eun Cho; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-04-30

3.  Functional computed tomography scanning for evaluating fusion status after anterior cervical decompression fusion.

Authors:  Jun Ouchida; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Taro Inoue; Keisuke Tomita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 5.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

Review 7.  Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Lucy Zhang; Daniel B Scherman; Prashanth J Rao; Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Failure in Cervical Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Authors:  Terence Verla; David S Xu; Matthew J Davis; Edward M Reece; Michelle Kelly; Mervin Nunez; Sebastian J Winocour; Alexander E Ropper
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft.

Authors:  Abdul Fettah Buyuk; Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Christian J Gaffney; Amir A Mehbod; John M Dawson; Timothy A Garvey; Benjamin Mueller; James D Schwender
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

Review 10.  Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Anna-Lena Robinson; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.