Literature DB >> 9244103

Intussusception in the 1990s: has 25 years made a difference?

S H Ein1, D Alton, S B Palder, B Shandling, D Stringer.   

Abstract

To evaluate the current management of the infant and child with intussusception, the medical records of 188 consecutive intussusception patients over 5 years (1985-1990) were reviewed and compared to our series from 25 years ago (1959-1968). The peak months changed from May and June to January and July. Duration of symptoms and signs prior to diagnosis increased by one-third to 35 h with, however, a decrease in the incidence of pain, vomiting, abdominal mass, and rectal blood. Air was the only contrast used for the hydrostatic enema in the present series and was tried in every case with 81% success; this is a major improvement from 45% in the old series. There were three perforations (1.4%) with air-enema attempts compared with 1 (0.2%) 25 years ago. Recently only 19% of patients required operation but 30% needed resection; 55% of the patients in the older series required operation and 20% needed resection. Ten percent of intussusceptions continue to be found spontaneously reduced at operation. There were many less pathologic lead points in the newer series. The recurrences increased from 4% to 7%, but their reduction rate also increased from 31% with barium to 100% with air. There were no deaths in the last 25 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244103     DOI: 10.1007/bf01076943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  12 in total

1.  An experimental study of the effects of barium and intestinal contents on the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  D Q COCHRAN; C H ALMOND; W A SHUCART
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1963-04

2.  Intussusception: barium or air?

Authors:  S B Palder; S H Ein; D A Stringer; D Alton
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Perforation during hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: proposed mechanism and review of the literature.

Authors:  R T Bramson; J G Blickman
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Comparison of oxygen and barium reduction of ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  E Phelan; J F de Campo; G Malecky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6,396 cases in 13 years.

Authors:  J Z Guo; X Y Ma; Q H Zhou
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage. Effects on peritoneum.

Authors:  A Z Ginai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years.

Authors:  S H Ein; C A Stephens
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Leading points in childhood intussusception.

Authors:  S H Ein
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptions caused by lead points.

Authors:  S H Ein; B Shandling; B J Reilly; D A Stringer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Perforation of the intussuscepted colon.

Authors:  A Humphry; S H Ein; P M Mok
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Intussusception. Part 3: Diagnosis and management of those with an identifiable or predisposing cause and those that reduce spontaneously.

Authors:  Oscar Navarro; Alan Daneman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-10-08

2.  Chronic intussusception in children caused by Ascaris lumbricoides.

Authors:  Harry Nikolić; Goran Palčevski; Giordano Saina; Mladen Peršić
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Deep sedation during pneumatic reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  Anat Ilivitzki; Luda Glozman Shtark; Karin Arish; Ahuva Engel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-05

4.  Air enema for intussusception: is predicting the outcome important?

Authors:  P Ramachandran; A Gupta; P Vincent; S Sridharan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

6.  Childhood intussusception: Impact of delay in presentation in a developing country.

Authors:  Olakayode Olaolu Ogundoyin; Dare Isaac Olulana; Taiwo Akeem Lawal
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  The radiological characteristics of childhood intussusception including unusual features and rare pathological lead points.

Authors:  Ruba Khasawneh; Mwaffaq El-Heis; Mamoon Al-Omari; Mohammed A Al-Qaralleh; Abdel Rahman Al-Manasra; Abdallah A Alqudah; Samah Awad
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.