Literature DB >> 9243439

Appendicectomy in Scotland: a 20-year epidemiological comparison.

A F Bisset1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the research was to study the pattern of appendicectomies in Scotland over the last 20 years.
METHOD: Routine National Health Service data on patients discharged after appendicectomy in Scotland during 1973-1993 were analysed.
RESULTS: For all ages, the appendicectomy rate has fallen steadily from 1.97 per 1000 (10,325 operations) in 1973 to 0.96 per 1000 (4906 operations) in 1993. The proportion of emergency operations increased from 76 to 80 per cent. The median age at operation rose from 18 to 22 years. The proportion of male patients remained higher for emergency operations, whereas the proportion of females, and age at operation, were both higher for non-emergency appendicectomies. In the period 1992-1995, appendicectomy rates were higher for patients with postcodes in areas of greater deprivation, particularly for children aged 0-14 years. Variation in childhood appendicectomy rates across Scotland has declined: apart from Ayrshire and Arran, which had a lower than expected rate, no Health Board had a rate significantly different from the rate in the rest of Scotland in 1993. The case fatality rate fell from 7.0 per 1000 to 1.6 per 1000 (with all the latter deaths in elderly patients).
CONCLUSION: Over the last 20 years, appendicectomy rates have declined in Scotland and there is now greater uniformity of childhood appendicectomy rates across Scotland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243439     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  6 in total

1.  Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996.

Authors:  P G Blomqvist; R E Andersson; F Granath; M P Lambe; A R Ekbom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Paolo Sandonà; Domenico Mantoan; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Wayne A Woodward; George A Sarosi; Robert W Haley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Appendicitis after appendicectomy.

Authors:  James Clark; N Theodorou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Appendicectomies in Albanians in Greece: outcomes in a highly mobile immigrant patient population.

Authors:  A Tatsioni; A Charchanti; E Kitsiou; J P Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.