Literature DB >> 9240665

Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.

B Boné1, Z Péntek, L Perbeck, B Veress.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray mammography and of MR imaging in 238 consecutively operated breasts, and to correlate the findings to histopathological diagnosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over 15 months, 220 patients scheduled for breast surgery were examined consecutively, before surgery, by means of both mammography and MR imaging. Of the 220 patients, 18 underwent bilateral breast surgery. The entire breast was examined by means of T1-weighted transversal images using a 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. One pre- and 2 post-contrast scans were performed. Each breast was examined by means of mammography and 3 views were applied as routine. All palpable and mammographically suspect lesions were examined on additional images as microfocus magnification or spot compression. The two methods were evaluated independently of each other.
RESULTS: In total, 145 malignant and 93 benign lesions were found at histopathological examination. The sensitivity of mammography was 89% and MR imaging 92%. The specificity was 72% in both methods. When the results of the 2 methods were combined, a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 55% was achieved.
CONCLUSION: Mammography and MR imaging seemed to complement each other to produce a high sensitivity. Unfortunately it is impossible at present to supplement mammography with MR imaging in each patient as a routine owing to the current technical and financial limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240665     DOI: 10.1080/02841859709174374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  13 in total

1.  A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Violeta Roka; Nikolaos Arikidis; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Ioannis V Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  99mTc-sestamibi uptake and histological malignancy grade in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Rimma Danielsson; Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo; Anna Pegerfalk; Hanna Grabowska; Stig A Larsson; Beata Boné; Peter Aspelin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Methodology development for three-dimensional MR-guided near infrared spectroscopy of breast tumors.

Authors:  Colin M Carpenter; Subhadra Srinivasan; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rajini Katipamula; Amy C Degnim; Tanya Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Charles Loprinzi; Clive S Grant; Kathleen R Brandt; Sandhya Pruthi; Christopher G Chute; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch; James N Ingle; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions.

Authors:  Renato de Oliveira Pereira; Larissa Almondes da Luz; Diego Cipriano Chagas; Jefferson Rodrigues Amorim; Elmo de Jesus Nery-Júnior; Araci Castelo Branco Rodrigues Alves; Flávio Teixeira de Abreu-Neto; Maria da Conceição Barros Oliveira; Danylo Rafhael Costa Silva; José Maria Soares-Júnior; Benedito Borges da Silva
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Nonlinear elasto-mammography for characterization of breast tissue properties.

Authors:  Z G Wang; Y Liu; G Wang; L Z Sun
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-12-22

7.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  S Malur; S Wurdinger; A Moritz; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Elastography method for reconstruction of nonlinear breast tissue properties.

Authors:  Z G Wang; Y Liu; G Wang; L Z Sun
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-07-09

9.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Authors' Reply "Comments: Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions".

Authors:  Renato de Oliveira Pereira; Larissa Almondes da Luz; Diego Cipriano Chagas; Jefferson Rodrigues Amorim; Elmo de Jesus Nery-Junior; Araci Castelo Branco Rodrigues Alves; Flávio Teixeira de Abreu-Neto; Maria da Conceicão Barros Oliveira; Danylo Rafhael Costa Silva; José Maria Soares-Júnior; Benedito Borges da Silva
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.