Literature DB >> 9240528

Fluoroscopically guided injections into the foot and ankle: localization of the source of pain as a guide to treatment--prospective study.

P E Lucas1, S R Hurwitz, P A Kaplan, R G Dussault, E J Maurer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the value of injections of local anesthetic and steroids in the foot and ankle in localizing the source of pain and their effect on clinical confidence and decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 47 patients, fluoroscopically guided injections of local anesthetic and steroid into the foot and ankle were performed in 106 intra- and extraarticular sites. Questionnaires were completed by the referring surgeon before and after injections to evaluate the level of confidence with regard to the source of pain for each site injected and the proposed treatment plan.
RESULTS: Forty-three (91%) patients reported pain relief after injections. The level of confidence that the site injected was the source of pain increased in 68 (64%) sites, decreased in 19 (18%) sites, and remained unaltered in 19 (18%) sites (P < .01). The treatment plan was changed from nonsurgical initially to surgical in three (8%) of 36 patients and was changed from surgical to nonsurgical in three (27%) of 11 patients after injections. Of the remaining eight patients, treatment was altered in three (37%) as a result of pain relief after the injections.
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically guided injections of local anesthetic and steroid in the foot and ankle can improve clinical confidence with regard to the site of pain and may be valuable in clinical decision making and patient treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240528     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Barry G Hansford; Megan K Mills; Christopher J Hanrahan; Corrie M Yablon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The posterolateral fluoroscopy-guided injection technique into the posterior subtalar joint: description of the procedure and pilot study on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Midfoot arthritis- current concepts review.

Authors:  Harish Kurup; Nijil Vasukutty
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-08

4.  Percutaneous foot joint needle placement using a C-arm flat-panel detector CT.

Authors:  Martin Wiewiorski; Martin Thanh Long Takes; Victor Valderrabano; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Summary Report of the Arthritis Foundation and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society's Symposium on Targets for Osteoarthritis Research: Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Current Imaging Approaches.

Authors:  Jason S Kim; Annunziato Amendola; Alexej Barg; Judith Baumhauer; James W Brodsky; Daniel M Cushman; Tyler A Gonzalez; Dennis Janisse; Michael J Jurynec; J Lawrence Marsh; Carolyn M Sofka; Thomas O Clanton; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-10-15

6.  Radiation dose and intra-articular access: comparison of the lateral mortise and anterior midline approaches to fluoroscopically guided tibiotalar joint injections.

Authors:  Ambrose J Huang; Rene Balza; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella; Connie Y Chang; Frank J Simeone; William E Palmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Tarsometatarsal joint communication during fluoroscopy-guided therapeutic joint injections and relationship with patient age and degree of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yoshimi Endo; O Kenechi Nwawka; Shrita Smith; Jayme C Burket
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?

Authors:  Mark Stegeman; Berbke To Josephine van Ginneken; Bastiaan Boetes; Mirjam Tuinhout; Jan Willem Karel Louwerens; Bartele Alexander Swierstra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Technetium-99m Methylene Diphosphonate Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography of the Foot and Ankle.

Authors:  Bhavin Upadhyay; Jonathan Mo; Clare Beadsmoore; Tom Marshall; Andoni Toms; John Buscombe
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.