Literature DB >> 9240107

Survival rates for four forms of cancer in the United States and Ontario.

D M Keller1, E A Peterson, G Silberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, cancer survival rates for patients diagnosed in Ontario and selected areas within the United States were compared.
METHODS: Relative survival rates were computed for patients aged 15 through 84 years diagnosed with any of four forms of cancer (breast, colon, lung, and Hodgkin's disease). The cohorts represented those diagnosed over the years 1978 through 1986 in the Canadian province of Ontario and in nine regions covered by the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program. Patients were followed through the end of 1990.
RESULTS: The cumulative relative survival rates were similar for American and Canadian patients. The largest difference was observed for breast cancer, where patients in the United States enjoyed a survival advantage throughout the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the United States and Ontario with the diseases studied, except for breast cancer, experience very similar survival. The greater use of mammographic screening in the United States could account for that country's higher breast cancer survival rate by promoting earlier and therefore more efficacious treatment, by introducing bias, or by a combination of both treatment and bias factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240107      PMCID: PMC1380891          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.

Authors:  F EDERER; L M AXTELL; S J CUTLER
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1961-09

2.  Health and surgical outcomes in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  L L Roos; E S Fisher; R Brazauskas; S M Sharp; E Shapiro
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A national health program for the United States. A physicians' proposal.

Authors:  D U Himmelstein; S Woolhandler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Health spending, delivery, and outcomes in OECD countries.

Authors:  G J Schieber; J P Poullier; L M Greenwald
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  A comparison of international health outcomes and health care spending.

Authors:  A Babazono; A L Hillman
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Trends in the utilization of mammography in Washington state and British Columbia: relation to stage of diagnosis and mortality.

Authors:  S J Katz; E B Larson; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Waiting times for knee-replacement surgery in the United States and Ontario.

Authors:  P C Coyte; J G Wright; G A Hawker; C Bombardier; R S Dittus; J E Paul; D A Freund; E Ho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A computer program package for relative survival analysis.

Authors:  T Hakulinen; K H Abeywickrama
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1985

9.  Testing equality of relative survival patterns based on aggregated data.

Authors:  T Hakulinen; L Tenkanen; K Abeywickrama; L Päivärinta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Progress against cancer?

Authors:  J C Bailar; E M Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Socialized medicine and mortality.

Authors:  Sam Peltzman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2014-07-15

2.  An international comparison of cancer survival: metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; N L Richter; C M Meyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; A Moskowitz; D J Webster; N L Richter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Breast cancer survival in Canada and the USA: meta-analytic evidence of a Canadian advantage in low-income areas.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Profound barriers to basic cancer care most notably experienced by uninsured women: Historical note on the present policy considerations.

Authors:  Amy M Alberton; Kevin M Gorey
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2017-09-07

6.  A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Pj Devereaux; Joel Lexchin; Samuel B Stone; Armine Yalnizyan; David Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Qi Zhou; Laurie J Goldsmith; Deborah J Cook; Ted Haines; Christina Lacchetti; John N Lavis; Terrence Sullivan; Ed Mills; Shelley Kraus; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-04-14

7.  Breast Cancer Care in California and Ontario: Primary Care Protections Greatest Among the Most Socioeconomically Vulnerable Women Living in the Most Underserved Places.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2017-01-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.