Literature DB >> 9239546

Testing the daily stress stimulus theory of bone adaptation with natural and experimentally controlled strain histories.

D J Adams1, A A Spirt, T D Brown, S P Fritton, C T Rubin, R A Brand.   

Abstract

Theories of bone adaptation generally consider that a departure in some feature of the normal homeostatic mechanical stimulus governs mechanical adaptation. Specifically, the 'daily stress stimulus' theory commonly used in computational models of bone adaptation suggests that the mechanical stimulus arises from a synthesis of the peak magnitudes from each loading event during a day. In this study, the homeostatic daily strain history of the adult turkey ulna was established by categorizing and counting the natural wing activities of adult male turkeys over a full 24h period. Strain signals were recorded in vivo for each activity type at three mid-diaphysis sites using stacked rosette strain gages. Following surgical isolation and transverse metaphyseal pinning of the ulnae, additional strain signals were recorded during controlled axial and torsional loading regimens associated with documented maintenance, loss, or addition of bone mass. When the present data were incorporated into the daily stress stimulus formulation, the theory did not consistently discriminate maintenance versus formation regimens, i.e., some maintenance regimens were associated with a substantially higher daily stimulus than some regimens causing bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9239546     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00004-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

Review 1.  How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Richard A Brand; Clark M Stanford; Colby C Swan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Collagen fiber orientation pattern, osteon morphology and distribution, and presence of laminar histology do not distinguish torsion from bending in bat and pigeon wing bones.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Madison S Doutré
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Mechanical Signals As a Non-Invasive Means to Influence Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate, Promoting Bone and Suppressing the Fat Phenotype.

Authors:  Yen K Luu; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Bonekey Osteovision       Date:  2009-04-01

Review 5.  Evidence for pleiotropic factors in genetics of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Physical activity alters limb bone structure but not entheseal morphology.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Julia M Winchester; Anne Su; Doug M Boyer; Nicolai Konow
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  David Karasik
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density.

Authors:  Clinton T Rubin; Howard Seeherman; Yi-Xian Qin; Ted S Gross
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Habitual hip joint activity level of the penned EMU (Dromaius novaehollandie).

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Hannah J Lundberg; Michael G Conzemius; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2007

10.  Low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical signals accelerate and augment endochondral bone repair: preliminary evidence of efficacy.

Authors:  Allen E Goodship; Timothy J Lawes; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.