Literature DB >> 9237916

Calculation of the dielectric properties of a protein and its solvent: theory and a case study.

G Löffler1, H Schreiber, O Steinhauser.   

Abstract

This paper presents a rigorous derivation of a theory for the calculation of the frequency-dependent dielectric properties of each component of the system protein/water/ions with the aim of enabling comparison to experimentally determined dielectric properties. We apply this theory to a very long (13.1 ns) molecular dynamics simulation of an HIV1 zinc finger peptide, its co-ordinated zinc ion, and two chloride ions in a box of SPC/E water molecules. We find the dielectric relaxation of the water molecules restricted compared to pure water, giving rise to a static dielectric constant for the water-component of only 47. The peptide is found to have a complicated dielectric relaxation behaviour, with a static dielectric constant of 15. We also calculate the frequency-dependent conductivity of the ions in this system. We analyze all contributions to the calculation of these dielectric properties and find that the coupling between the dielectric relaxation of the peptide and that of the water-component is particularly important for correctly describing the dielectric constant of the peptide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9237916     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  24 in total

1.  Photosynthetic electron transfer controlled by protein relaxation: analysis by Langevin stochastic approach.

Authors:  D A Cherepanov; L I Krishtalik; A Y Mulkidjanian
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A critical investigation of the Tanford-Kirkwood scheme by means of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  F L Da Silva; B Jönsson; R Penfold
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Vibrational coupling, isotopic editing, and beta-sheet structure in a membrane-bound polypeptide.

Authors:  Cynthia Paul; Jianping Wang; William C Wimley; Robin M Hochstrasser; Paul H Axelsen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Local compressibilities of proteins: comparison of optical experiments and simulations for horse heart cytochrome-c.

Authors:  Christina Scharnagl; Maria Reif; Josef Friedrich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Molecular dynamics of a protein surface: ion-residues interactions.

Authors:  Ran Friedman; Esther Nachliel; Menachem Gutman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Tuning direct current streaming dielectrophoresis of proteins.

Authors:  Asuka Nakano; Fernanda Camacho-Alanis; Tzu-Chiao Chao; Alexandra Ros
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 7.  Dielectric relaxation in proteins: the computational perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Detailed study of the dielectric function of a lysozyme solution studied with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Stelios Floros; Maria Liakopoulou-Kyriakides; Kostas Karatasos; Georgios E Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 1.733

9.  Specific and non-specific protein association in solution: computation of solvent effects and prediction of first-encounter modes for efficient configurational bias Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Antonio Cardone; Harish Pant; Sergio A Hassan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Electrochromic shift of chlorophyll absorption in photosystem I from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: a probe of optical and dielectric properties around the secondary electron acceptor.

Authors:  Naranbaatar Dashdorj; Wu Xu; Peter Martinsson; Parag R Chitnis; Sergei Savikhin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.