Literature DB >> 9237054

A double-blind controlled clinical trial of oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin in adults with previously untreated epilepsy.

P A Bill1, U Vigonius, H Pohlmann, C A Guerreiro, S Kochen, D Saffer, A Moore.   

Abstract

In the last 5 years oxcarbazepine (OXC) has been registered in many countries for use as first-line and add-on treatment for partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures (PS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures without partial onset (GTCS). Its use as monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy was investigated in this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison with phenytoin (PHT). A total of 287 adult patients, with either PS or GTCS, were randomized. After retrospective baseline assessment, patients were randomized to OXC or PHT in a 1:1 ratio. The double-blind treatment phase was divided into two periods: a flexible titration period of 8 weeks, followed by 48 weeks of maintenance treatment. In the efficacy analyses, no statistically significant differences were found between the treatment groups. Seventy patients (59.3%) in the OXC group and 69 (58.0%) in the PHT group were seizure-free during the maintenance period. A total of 56 of the patients in the OXC group discontinued treatment prematurely (five because of tolerability reasons) compared to 61 in the PHT group (16 for tolerability reasons). The number of premature discontinuations due to adverse experiences showed a statistically significant difference in favour of OXC. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the total number of premature discontinuations. This trial provides further support for the efficacy and safety of OXC as first-line treatment in adults with PS and GTCS. In addition, the results show that OXC has significant advantages over PHT in terms of tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9237054     DOI: 10.1016/s0920-1211(97)00024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  29 in total

Review 1.  New antiepileptic drugs: comparative studies of efficacy and cognition.

Authors:  Steven L Weinstein; Joan Conry
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  New antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  C W Bazil
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Epilepsy in elderly people.

Authors:  Martin J Brodie; Patrick Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-03

Review 4.  Prescribing antiepileptics for the elderly: differences between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Mary Jo V Pugh; Perry J Foreman; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Sarah J Nevitt; Maria Sudell; Jennifer Weston; Catrin Tudur Smith; Anthony G Marson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 6.  Choice and use of newer anticonvulsant drugs in older patients.

Authors:  L J Willmore
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice.

Authors:  M J Brodie; P Kwan
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Oxcarbazepine: an update of its efficacy in the management of epilepsy.

Authors:  K Wellington; K L Goa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 9.  New generation antiepileptic drugs: what do they offer in terms of improved tolerability and safety?

Authors:  Jacqueline A French; Deana M Gazzola
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2011-08

Review 10.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on sleep structure : are all drugs equal?

Authors:  Carl W Bazil
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.