Literature DB >> 9236967

Effect of Medicaid expansions on preterm birth.

W A Ray1, E F Mitchel, J M Piper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inadequate prenatal care is thought to be a major modifiable risk factor for preterm birth, the leading cause of neonatal mortality. To improve high-risk women's financial access to prenatal care, the U.S. Medicaid program underwent major expansions during the 1980s. We evaluated these expansions over the nine-year period 1983 to 1991 in Tennessee to determine their effects on Medicaid enrollment, use of prenatal care, and preterm birth.
METHODS: We used linked birth certificates, Medicaid data, and U.S. Census files to identify 610,056 singleton births to African-American or Caucasian women in Tennessee whose last menstrual period was between 1983 and 1991. These were classified by maternal characteristics to identify groups with the greatest postexpansion increases in Medicaid enrollment, which should have benefited most from the policy changes. Study outcomes were Medicaid enrollment by delivery, enrollment in the first trimester, inadequate prenatal care (modified Kessner index), and preterm (< 37 weeks) birth. We calculated the changes (delta expressed as births per 100) between 1983 and 1991 in percentages of births with each of these outcomes.
RESULTS: The expansions led to pronounced increases in maternal Medicaid enrollment by delivery (21% of births in 1983 to 51% by 1991) and in the first trimester (from 10% to 37%). Married women with < 12 years of education, < 25 years of age, and < $12,500 mean neighborhood incomes (group 1) had the greatest increase, where enrollment and first-trimester enrollment increased from 24% to 86% and 7% to 68%, respectively. In group 1, the percentages of births with inadequate maternal use of prenatal care decreased substantially, from 12.8% in 1983 to 6.4% in 1991, a reduction of 6.4 births per 100 (95% confidence intervals [CI] = -7.6, -5.3). However, the preterm birth rate did not decrease (9.1% in 1983, 9.4% in 1991, change of 0.3[-0.7 to 1.2] births per 100). For other births, there were lesser increases in Medicaid enrollment, correspondingly lesser decreases in inadequate use of prenatal care, but no reductions in preterm birth rates.
CONCLUSIONS: In Tennessee, the Medicaid expansions materially increased enrollment and use of prenatal care among high-risk women, but did not reduce the likelihood of preterm birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women.

Authors:  L Dubay; T Joyce; R Kaestner; G M Kenney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods.

Authors:  Ninez A Ponce; Katherine J Hoggatt; Michelle Wilhelm; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy.

Authors:  Leo Turcotte; John Robst; Solomon Polachek
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-09

4.  Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference?

Authors:  Deborah Rosenberg; Arden Handler; Kristin M Rankin; Meagan Zimbeck; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-09

5.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Racial differences in prenatal care use in the United States: are disparities decreasing?

Authors:  Greg R Alexander; Michael D Kogan; Sara Nabukera
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  D S Wilkinson; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

8.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

9.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

10.  Issues and biases in matching medicaid pregnancy episodes to vital records data: the Arkansas experience.

Authors:  Janet M Bronstein; Charles T Lomatsch; David Fletcher; Terri Wooten; Tsai Mei Lin; Richard Nugent; Curtis L Lowery
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.