Literature DB >> 9236468

Ensuring the survival of the clinician-scientist.

R W Schrier1.   

Abstract

Many forces threaten the survival of the clinician-scientist as an academic species, among them: (1) the changing health environment; (2) the complexity of and rapid advances in biomedical science, which necessitate that MD-PhD graduates "retool" after completing their clinical training; (3) the length and rigor of the research training required to train clinician-scientists adequately; (4) the scarcity of funding for subspecialty training positions; (5) the perception that the successful clinician-scientists in academic medicine are those who focus on basic, rather than clinical, research; (6) the indebtedness of young physicians when they complete medical schools; (7) the fierce competition for research funding; and (8) pessimism among senior faculty about the clinician-scientist's potential for survival. There are solutions to these issues that must be vigorously pursued to ensure the survival of the clinician-scientist: (1) Rigorous six- to seven-year programs (e.g., two in internal medicine, four to five in a subspecialty) for physicians must be established. They should include a minimum of three years of research and should lead to board certification in internal medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, etc., board certification in a subspecialty, and a PhD in clinical science. (2) These programs must have a choice of three tracks, (a) disease-oriented basic research, (b) clinical investigation in patients, and (c) health services research. Such a program--the PhD in Clinical Science program--has recently been approved and begun at the University of Colorado. (3) Funding organizations such as the National Institutes of Health should designate their training resources primarily for programs with a minimum of three years of formal and rigorous research training. (4) These rigorous research training programs must be integrated with young-faculty awards for clinician-scientists to ensure continuity in their investigative careers. (5) Loan-repayment programs must be developed to repay student loans of clinician-scientists during their first five years as faculty members. (6) Against the background of these changes, senior faculty as mentors must articulate to emerging clinician-scientists the excitement of being involved in future discoveries in biomedical science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236468     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199707000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  9 in total

1.  A questionnaire survey of stress and bullying in doctors undertaking research.

Authors:  J Stebbing; S Mandalia; S Portsmouth; P Leonard; J Crane; M Bower; H Earl; L Quine
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research: a controlled before-and-after study.

Authors:  Bernd Löwe; Mechthild Hartmann; Beate Wild; Christoph Nikendei; Kurt Kroenke; Dorothea Niehoff; Peter Henningsen; Stephan Zipfel; Wolfgang Herzog
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Dual training as clinician-scientist in child and adolescent psychiatry: are we there yet?

Authors:  Alexis Revet; Johannes Hebebrand; Sampada Bhide; João Caseiro; Eugenia Conti; Marike Deutz; Andra Isac; Athanasios Kanellopoulos; Tuğba Kalyoncu; Katri Maasalo; Silvana Markovska-Simoska; Marija Mitkovic-Voncina; Silvia Molteni; Mariela Mosheva; Susanne Mudra; Julia Philipp; Cecil Prins-Aardema; Marina Romero Gonzalez; Antonín Šebela; Jochen Seitz; Lise Eilin Stene; Nikolina Vrljičak Davidović; Ida Wessing; Paul Klauser
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Future Directions of Training Physician-Scientists: Reimagining and Remeasuring the Workforce.

Authors:  Wyatt P Bensken; Avindra Nath; John D Heiss; Omar I Khan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Evaluation of attitude to, knowledge of and barriers toward research among medical science students.

Authors:  Mahtab Memarpour; Ali Poostforoush Fard; Roghieh Ghasemi
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2015-02-11

6.  Re-tooling critical care to become a better intensivist: something old and something new.

Authors:  John J Marini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Authorship Trends of Emergency Medicine Publications over the Last Two Decades.

Authors:  Richard Lammers; Thomas Simunich; John Ashurst
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-05

8.  Medical students' perceptions towards research at a Sudanese University.

Authors:  Tarig Osman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Factors Affecting the Quality of Undergraduate Pharmacy Students' Researches in Ambo University, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study from Advisors' Perspective.

Authors:  Esayas Tadesse Gebremariam; Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.