Literature DB >> 30640263

Future Directions of Training Physician-Scientists: Reimagining and Remeasuring the Workforce.

Wyatt P Bensken1, Avindra Nath, John D Heiss, Omar I Khan.   

Abstract

In academic medicine, the attrition of the physician-scientist workforce has been significantly discussed for the past three decades, with substantial attention and funding targeted to stop this attrition and attempt to reinvigorate the workforce. Despite these concerns and efforts, the attrition has not been stopped or even significantly slowed, and thus a further understanding of the physician-scientist workforce is needed with a closer look at how this workforce is measured and quantified. Through reviewing three methods by which physician-scientists are identified and understood, limitations in these definitions arise, leading to the basic question: Who qualifies to be a physician-scientist? Answering this question may lead to developing more comprehensive and less restrictive approaches when qualifying and measuring the physician-scientist workforce and appreciating the varying contributions physicians make to research. Through suggesting an expanded appreciation of these research contributions, recognition of collaboration, and funding models that support both of these aspects, the authors hope to add to the conversation by challenging traditional approaches and encouraging movement toward forward-looking definitions that encourage and promote all physicians to engage with research. This reimagining of physician-scientists will result not just in a remeasuring of the workforce but, subsequently, in strengthening the clinical and translational research continuum as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30640263      PMCID: PMC6483871          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  22 in total

1.  Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now.

Authors:  Dianna M Milewicz; Robin G Lorenz; Terence S Dermody; Lawrence F Brass
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Preventing the extinction of the clinical research ecosystem.

Authors:  J N Thompson; J Moskowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Challenges and opportunities for reinvigorating the physician-scientist pipeline.

Authors:  Dania Daye; Chirag B Patel; Jaimo Ahn; Freddy T Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Physician-scientists in neurology: Research contributions of a cohort of neurologists.

Authors:  Wyatt P Bensken; Alexandra K Hansen; Gina Norato; John D Heiss; Avindra Nath; Omar I Khan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Physician Scientist Training in the United States: A Survey of the Current Literature.

Authors:  R O Kosik; D T Tran; Angela Pei-Chen Fan; G A Mandell; D C Tarng; H S Hsu; Y S Chen; T P Su; S J Wang; A W Chiu; C H Lee; M C Hou; F Y Lee; W S Chen; Q Chen
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 6.  Rejuvenating clinician-scientist training.

Authors:  Balamurali K Ambati; Judd Cahoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; James D Reschovsky
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-10

8.  Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Laurel L Haak; Walter T Schaffer; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".

Authors:  Howard B Dickler; Di Fang; Stephen J Heinig; Elizabeth Johnson; David Korn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predictors of full-time faculty appointment among MD-PhD program graduates: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-05-13
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical research capability enhanced for medical undergraduates: an innovative simulation-based clinical research curriculum development.

Authors:  Siyu Yan; Qiao Huang; Jiao Huang; Yu Wang; Xuhui Li; Yongbo Wang; Lisha Luo; Yunyun Wang; Yi Guo; Xiantao Zeng; Yinghui Jin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  The Drug Abuse Research Training (DART) Program for Psychiatry Residents and Summer Fellows: 15-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Jones; Kelly S Barth; Delisa G Brown; Colleen A Halliday; Kathleen T Brady; Sarah W Book; Emily J Bristol; Sudie E Back
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  Clinician-Scientist Faculty Mentoring Program (FAME) - A New Inclusive Training Model at Penn State Increases Scholarly Productivity and Extramural Grant Funding.

Authors:  Sinisa Dovat; Chandrika Gowda; Richard B Mailman; Leslie J Parent; Xuemei Huang
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-09-12

4.  Diversity and the next-generation physician-scientist.

Authors:  Anit Behera; Jessica Tan; Hanna Erickson
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-07-12

5.  Training methods that improve MD-PhD student self-efficacy for clinical research skills.

Authors:  Mathew Sebastian; Matthew A Robinson; Leanne Dumeny; Kyle A Dyson; Joseph C Fantone; Wayne T McCormack; W Stratford May
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-10-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.