Literature DB >> 9234971

Comparing Mersilene* tape and stainless steel wire as sublaminar spinal fixation in the Chagma baboon (Papio ursinus).

L J Grobler1, R W Gaines, P G Kempff.   

Abstract

The development of segmental instrumentation has been a major advancement in the treatment of spinal problems, but the use of sublaminar stainless steel wire (SSW) has not been without untoward effects. This study reports a comparison of Mersilene* tape (MT) and stainless steel wire (SSW) used for sublaminar fixation in the Chagma baboon (Papio Ursinus). A similar comparative study has not been reported, although the local effects of sublaminar SSW in the spinal canal have previously been described. The adult Chagma baboon was selected as the experimental animal due to its partial upright posture and spinal anatomy, similar to that of the human. Six levels of the thoracolumbar spine were instrumented with custom designed Harrington hooks and regular one-quarter inch threaded rods used as a distraction system. The four intervening laminae were fixed to the rods using doubled-over, eighteen gauge sublaminar SSW in six cases and five millimeter MT in six cases. Computed axial tomography used to measure the AP diameter of the bony spinal canal revealed the AP space occupied by the SSW and MT to be 32 percent and 14.8 percent respectively. In the MT group, the overlying dura mater was found to be totally intact and revealed no signs of abnormal tissue response. A well-formed connective tissue membrane consisting of dense connective tissue surrounded the MT and was found to consist of more mature fibers than that found in the SSW group. The dura-implant interface was examined histologically and a distinct membrane was identified between the dura and the superficial aspect of the MT's, as well as intervening between the two MT's. Following removal of the MT, in contrast to the SSW, it was apparent that the underlying dura was not injured, most probably due to the soft consistency of the Mersilene* tape and the well-formed overlying membrane. On clinical grounds the fixation in both groups was adequate but the MT group formed a well-circumscribed membrane that made removal of the MT easier and potentially safer. The AP space occupied by the spinal implant was also found to be less with MT as opposed to SSW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234971      PMCID: PMC2378116     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  14 in total

1.  Neurologic complications after sublaminar wiring. An experimental study in lambs.

Authors:  T Pampliega; J L Beguiristain; J Artieda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Does sublaminar wiring produce spinal stenosis?

Authors:  J E Nixon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-01

3.  Segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of neuromuscular spinal deformity.

Authors:  R F Taddonio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The anatomic basis and development of segmental spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A comparison between spinous process and sublaminar wiring combined with Harrington distraction instrumentation in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J G Thometz; J B Emans
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  [Treatment of spinal deformities with the Hartshill frame].

Authors:  M Onimus; J M Laurain
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1987

7.  The chronic local effects of sublaminar wires. An animal model.

Authors:  W C Schrader; D Bethem; V Scerbin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Mersilene tapes as a substitute for wire in segmental spinal instrumentation for children.

Authors:  R W Gaines; D L Abernathie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Neurologic injuries with the Galveston technique of L-rod instrumentation for scoliosis.

Authors:  B L Allen; R L Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Delayed paraplegia complicating sublaminar segmental spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  C E Johnston; L T Happel; R Norris; S W Burke; A G King; J M Roberts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Use of the Universal Clamp for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: preliminary results in scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jouve; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Benjamin Blondel; Franck Launay; Franck Accadbled; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 3.  Use of the Universal Clamp in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Jean-Luc Jouve; Brice Ilharreborde; Benjamin Blondel; Franck Accadbled; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.