Literature DB >> 9234409

Risk factors for colic in the Michigan (USA) equine population.

J B Kaneene1, R Miller, W A Ross, K Gallagher, J Marteniuk, J Rook.   

Abstract

A population-based prospective epidemiological study was conducted to assess risk factors for equine colic. A stratified sample of 3925 equids in 138 randomly selected equine farms in the state of Michigan was monitored in two 12-month rounds of data collection. Incidence densities were used to describe the rate of development of colic in the study population. Mortality rates, case fatality rates and survival rates were used to describe the severity of colic on the study population. Multivariable logistic regressions with random effects (grouped according to farm) were used to identify risk factors associated with occurrence of colic. A total of 3175 equids from 132 farms from the starting population of 3925 equids in 138 farms was used in the multivariable analysis. There were 77 cases of colic reported during the study period in 62 animals. Of these animals, 54 (87%) had one case, 5 (8%) had two cases, 2 (3%) had three cases, and 1 (2%) had seven cases. Of the cases reported, 49 (64%) were non-specific diagnoses, 13 (17%) impaction/acute intestinal obstruction colics, 7 (9%) spasmodic colics, 4 (5%) sand colics, 2 (3%) gas colics, 1 (1%) verminous mesenteric arteritis, and 1 (1%) enteritis due to ingestion of moldy grain. The annual incidence density of colic in the study was 3.5 cases per 100 equid-years. The surgical treatment risk was 17% (13/77). The overall mortality risk due to colic was 0.5 deaths per 100 equids, and the case fatality risk was 13% (10/77). The case fatality risk for cases treated surgically was 31% (4/13), while the case fatality risk for non-surgical colics was 10% (7/69). Risk factors associated with significantly increased likelihood of developing colic were foaling during the study, deworming during the study, increased age, and participation in showing activities. Geldings and equids provided group drinking water from sources other than tanks, buckets and automatic waterers were significantly associated with reduced risk of colic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234409     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01102-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  11 in total

1.  A retrospective evaluation of the causes of death of 448 insured French horses in 1995.

Authors:  A Leblond; I Villard; L Leblond; P Sabatier; A J Sasco
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Is equine colic seasonal? Novel application of a model based approach.

Authors:  Debra C Archer; Gina L Pinchbeck; Christopher J Proudman; Helen E Clough
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Epidemiology of impaction colic in donkeys in the UK.

Authors:  Ruth Cox; Christopher J Proudman; Andrew F Trawford; Faith Burden; Gina L Pinchbeck
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Evaluation of clinical and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in hospitalised gastrointestinal colic horses.

Authors:  Carl F Ihler; Jostein Larsen Venger; Eystein Skjerve
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Prevalence of and risk factors for colic in horses that display crib-biting behaviour.

Authors:  Ebony E Escalona; Claire N Okell; Debra C Archer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Prospective survey of veterinary practitioners' primary assessment of equine colic: clinical features, diagnoses, and treatment of 120 cases of large colon impaction.

Authors:  Kyra Jennings; Laila Curtis; John Burford; Sarah Freeman
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Comparison of psyllium feeding at home and nasogastric intubation of psyllium and magnesium sulfate in the hospital as a treatment for naturally occurring colonic sand (geosediment) accumulations in horses: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ritva Kaikkonen; Kati Niinistö; Tiina Lindholm; Marja Raekallio
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  A Microbiological Map of the Healthy Equine Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Aaron C Ericsson; Philip J Johnson; Marco A Lopes; Sonja C Perry; Hannah R Lanter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A longitudinal study of the faecal microbiome and metabolome of periparturient mares.

Authors:  Shebl E Salem; Rachael Hough; Chris Probert; Thomas W Maddox; Philipp Antczak; Julian M Ketley; Nicola J Williams; Sarah J Stoneham; Debra C Archer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Bugs and drugs: a systems biology approach to characterising the effect of moxidectin on the horse's faecal microbiome.

Authors:  S P Daniels; J Leng; J R Swann; C J Proudman
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.