S P Daniels1,2, J Leng3, J R Swann4, C J Proudman3. 1. School of Equine Management and Science, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL9 6JS, UK. simon.daniels@rau.ac.uk. 2. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7TE, UK. simon.daniels@rau.ac.uk. 3. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7TE, UK. 4. Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anthelmintic treatment is a risk factor for intestinal disease in the horse, known as colic. However the mechanisms involved in the onset of disease post anthelmintic treatment are unknown. The interaction between anthelmintic drugs and the gut microbiota may be associated with this observed increase in risk of colic. Little is known about the interaction between gut microbiota and anthelmintics and how treatment may alter microbiome function. The objectives of this study were: To characterise (1) faecal microbiota, (2) feed fermentation kinetics in vitro and (3) metabolic profiles following moxidectin administration to horses with very low (0 epg) adult strongyle burdens. HYPOTHESIS: Moxidectin will not alter (1) faecal microbiota, (2) feed fermentation in vitro, or, (3) host metabolome. RESULTS: Moxidectin increased the relative abundance of Deferribacter spp. and Spirochaetes spp. observed after 160 h in moxidectin treated horses. Reduced in vitro fibre fermentation was observed 16 h following moxidectin administration in vivo (P = 0.001), along with lower pH in the in vitro fermentations from the moxidectin treated group. Metabolic profiles from urine samples did not differ between the treatment groups. However metabolic profiles from in vitro fermentations differed between moxidectin and control groups 16 h after treatment (R2 = 0.69, Q2Y = 0.48), and within the moxidectin group between 16 h and 160 h post moxidectin treatment (R2 = 0.79, Q2Y = 0.77). Metabolic profiles from in vitro fermentations and fermentation kinetics both indicated altered carbohydrate metabolism following in vivo treatment with moxidectin. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in horses with low parasite burdens moxidectin had a small but measurable effect on both the community structure and the function of the gut microbiome.
BACKGROUND: Anthelmintic treatment is a risk factor for intestinal disease in the horse, known as colic. However the mechanisms involved in the onset of disease post anthelmintic treatment are unknown. The interaction between anthelmintic drugs and the gut microbiota may be associated with this observed increase in risk of colic. Little is known about the interaction between gut microbiota and anthelmintics and how treatment may alter microbiome function. The objectives of this study were: To characterise (1) faecal microbiota, (2) feed fermentation kinetics in vitro and (3) metabolic profiles following moxidectin administration to horses with very low (0 epg) adult strongyle burdens. HYPOTHESIS: Moxidectin will not alter (1) faecal microbiota, (2) feed fermentation in vitro, or, (3) host metabolome. RESULTS:Moxidectin increased the relative abundance of Deferribacter spp. and Spirochaetes spp. observed after 160 h in moxidectin treated horses. Reduced in vitro fibre fermentation was observed 16 h following moxidectin administration in vivo (P = 0.001), along with lower pH in the in vitro fermentations from the moxidectin treated group. Metabolic profiles from urine samples did not differ between the treatment groups. However metabolic profiles from in vitro fermentations differed between moxidectin and control groups 16 h after treatment (R2 = 0.69, Q2Y = 0.48), and within the moxidectin group between 16 h and 160 h post moxidectin treatment (R2 = 0.79, Q2Y = 0.77). Metabolic profiles from in vitro fermentations and fermentation kinetics both indicated altered carbohydrate metabolism following in vivo treatment with moxidectin. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in horses with low parasite burdens moxidectin had a small but measurable effect on both the community structure and the function of the gut microbiome.
Authors: Joy Leng; Chris Proudman; Alistair Darby; Frances Blow; Neil Townsend; Andrew Miller; Jonathan Swann Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Alba Cortés; Laura E Peachey; Timothy P Jenkins; Riccardo Scotti; Cinzia Cantacessi Journal: Parasitology Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Jesse F Tyma; Kira L Epstein; Canaan M Whitfield-Cargile; Noah D Cohen; Steeve Giguère Journal: Am J Vet Res Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 1.156
Authors: Ashley E Steuer; John C Stewart; Virginia D Barker; Amanda A Adams; Martin K Nielsen Journal: Parasite Immunol Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 2.280