Literature DB >> 8817254

Inhibition of the inferior olive during conditioned responses in the decerebrate ferret.

G Hesslow1, M Ivarsson.   

Abstract

Output from the interpositus nucleus can inhibit the inferior olive, probably via the GABA-ergic nucleo-olivary pathway. It has been suggested that the function of this inhibition might be to regulate synaptic plasticity resulting from parallel fibre/climbing fibre interaction in cerebellar Purkinje cells, by providing negative feedback information to the olive. Thus, when a learned response, generated by the interpositus nucleus, reaches a sufficient amplitude, the olive would be inhibited and further learning blocked. This suggestion was tested in a classical conditioning paradigm. Decerebrate ferrets were trained using electrical skin stimulation of the forelimb as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and periorbital stimulation as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Climbing fibre responses evoked in Purkinje cells by the US were recorded as surface field potentials in the part of the c3 zone controlling eyeblink. It was found that the CS did not inhibit the olive at the beginning of training, but when conditioned responses were large, the olive was inhibited by the CS in some animals. After a number of unpaired CS presentations, which caused extinction of the conditioned response, the inhibition disappeared. The size of individual conditioned responses correlated negatively with the size of the climbing fibre responses evoked by the US. Climbing fibre responses evoked by direct stimulation of the olive were also inhibited. It was concluded that cerebellar output during performance of a conditioned response inhibits the inferior olive. The results thus support the hypothesis of a cerebellar locus of conditioning and are consistent with the proposed role of cerebello-olivary inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817254     DOI: 10.1007/bf00241372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Discriminative classical conditioning in dogs paralyzed by curare can later control discriminative avoidance responses in the normal state.

Authors:  R L SOLOMON; L H TURNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response.

Authors:  J P Welsh; J A Harvey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Activity of Purkinje cells and interpositus neurones during and after periods of high frequency climbing fibre activation in the cat.

Authors:  G Andersson; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evidence for a GABA-mediated cerebellar inhibition of the inferior olive in the cat.

Authors:  G Andersson; M Garwicz; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modulatory influences of red nucleus stimulation on the somatosensory responses of cat trigeminal subnucleus oralis neurons.

Authors:  K D Davis; J O Dostrovsky
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Bilateral control of the orbicularis oculi muscle by one cerebellar hemisphere in the ferret.

Authors:  M Ivarsson; G Hesslow
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  D J Krupa; J K Thompson; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. IV. Lesions of the inferior olive.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  42 in total

1.  Developmental changes in eye-blink conditioning and neuronal activity in the inferior olive.

Authors:  D A Nicholson; J H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Interrelated modification of excitatory and inhibitory connections in the olivocerebellar neural network.

Authors:  I G Sil'kis
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

3.  Central regulation of cerebellar climbing fibre input during motor learning.

Authors:  Richard Apps; Stephen Lee
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The role of interpositus nucleus in eyelid conditioned responses.

Authors:  J M Delgado-García; A Gruart
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Developmental changes in eyeblink conditioning and neuronal activity in the pontine nuclei.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam S Muckler
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Addition of inhibition in the olivocerebellar system and the ontogeny of a motor memory.

Authors:  Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Developmental changes in the neural mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Daniel A Nicholson
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2004-03

8.  Changes in excitability of ascending and descending inputs to cerebellar climbing fibers during locomotion.

Authors:  Joanne Pardoe; Stephen A Edgley; Trevor Drew; Richard Apps
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Extinction as new learning versus unlearning: considerations from a computer simulation of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Michael D Mauk; Tatsuya Ohyama
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.