Literature DB >> 9232510

Genetic testing in children.

E W Clayton1.   

Abstract

In this article, the author focuses on the allocation of decision-making authority between parents and physicians. She argues that parents should have substantial room to decide whether genetic testing is good for their child and that they may appropriately consider interests in addition to those of their child in making such choices. A physician, however, may refuse to act pursuant to parental views about testing, when in the physician's view, the parents' choices would pose a risk of significant harm to the child. The balance of control between parents and physicians is illustrated by discussion of a series of case vignettes. Refusal to perform requested testing is most often warranted for testing for carrier status and for genetic predisposition to late onset disease. The author concludes her analysis by discussing why it is appropriate to give increasing deference to the views of the child as the child grows older.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232510     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/22.3.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  5 in total

Review 1.  Why tell asymptomatic children of the risk of an adult-onset disease in the family but not test them for it?

Authors:  P J Malpas
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  "Both Sides of the Wheelchair": The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors.

Authors:  Georgia C Lowe; Louise A Corben; Rony E Duncan; Grace Yoon; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Childhood genetic testing for familial cancer: should adoption make a difference?

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson; Samantha J Leonard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.

Authors:  Jeremy R Garrett; John D Lantos; Leslie G Biesecker; Janet E Childerhose; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm; Barbara A Koenig; Jean E McEwen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kyle Brothers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.