Literature DB >> 9232133

Remifentanil versus remifentanil/midazolam for ambulatory surgery during monitored anesthesia care.

M I Gold1, W D Watkins, Y F Sung, J Yarmush, F Chung, N T Uy, W Maurer, M Y Clarke, B D Jamerson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define the appropriate dose of remifentanil hydrochloride alone or combined with midazolam to provide satisfactory comfort and maintain adequate respiration for a monitored anesthesia care setting.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine patients scheduled for outpatient surgery participated in this multicenter, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: remifentanil, 1 microgram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (remifentanil), remifentanil, 0.5 microgram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (remifentanil+midazolam). Five minutes after the start of the infusion, patients received a loading dose of saline placebo (remifentanil) or midazolam, 1 mg, (remifentanil+midazolam). If patients were not oversedated, a second dose of placebo or midazolam, 1 mg, was given. Remifentanil was titrated (in increments of 50% from the initial rate) to limit patient discomfort or pain intraoperatively, and the infusion was terminated at the completion of skin closure.
RESULTS: At the time of the local anesthetic, most patients in the remifentanil and remifentanil+midazolam groups experienced no pain (66% and 60%, respectively) and no discomfort (66% and 65%, respectively). The final mean (+/-SD) remifentanil infusion rates were 0.12 +/- 0.05 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (remifentanil) and 0.07 +/- 0.03 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (remifentanil+midazolam). Fewer patients in the remifentanil+midazolam group experienced nauses compared with the remifentanil group (16% vs. 36%, respectively; P < 0.05). Four patients (5%) in the remifentanil group and two patients (2%) in the remifentanil+midazolam group experienced brief periods of oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) and hypoventilation (< 8 breaths/ min).
CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil alone or combined with midazolam provided adequate analgesia and maintained adequate respiration at the doses reported. The low dose of remifentanil combined with 2 mg midazolam, compared with remifentanil alone, resulted in fewer side effects, slightly greater sedation, and less anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232133     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  5 in total

1.  Remifentanil-propofol sedation as an ambulatory anesthesia for carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Jae-Jun Lee; Sung Mi Hwang; Ji Su Jang; So Young Lim; Dong-Hwa Heo; Yong Jun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-11-30

Review 2.  The clinical pharmacology of remifentanil: a brief review.

Authors:  Talmage D Egan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Use of remifentanil for analgesia during dressing change in spontaneously breathing non-intubated burn patients.

Authors:  R Le Floch; E Naux; A Pilorget; J-F Arnould
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2006-09-30

4.  Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Maria M Manolaraki; Angeliki Theodoropoulou; Charalampos Stroumpos; Emmanouil Vardas; Pantelis Oustamanolakis; Aliki Gritzali; Gregorios Chlouverakis; Gregorios A Paspatis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  [Ureteroscopy under intravenous analgesia with remifentanil].

Authors:  P-H Langen; M Karypiadou; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.