Literature DB >> 15103411

[Ureteroscopy under intravenous analgesia with remifentanil].

P-H Langen1, M Karypiadou, J Steffens.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, from September 2000 to September 2001, all ureteroscopies ( n=140) were performed under local and intravenous patient controlled analgesia using continuous infusion of remifentanil (Ultiva). The dosage of 0.15 micro g/kg/min was adapted to changing intraoperative pain (range 0.08-0.30 micro g/kg/min). Preoperative sedation with midazolam 2 mg was given 5 min prior to ureteroscopy. The efficacy of monitored anesthesia care ("Big MAC") was quantified by the patient using a visual analogue pain scale. A total of 97.1% (136/140) of the procedures were performed and finished under remifentanil. Only four male patients underwent conversion to general anesthesia due to insufficient analgesia. All but one patient would choose remifentanil again for first line anesthesia. Significant differences in pain scale values were noticed for male/female patients and ureteroscopies above/below the iliac vessel crossing. Side effects were rare being mainly hypoxic events (pO(2)<90% in 5.1%). Indication, intraoperative procedure, average surgery time (24 min), complications and primary success rate (96.6/90/63.3% stone free for distal/mid/proximal ureter, respectively) did not differ from the control group under general anesthesia. Ureteroscopies with remifentanil are safe, universally applicable because of refifentanil's organ independent esterase metabolism and as effective as general anesthesia. There is no need for PACU stay for patients due to the ultra-short drug half-life, and therefore remifentanil is cost effective and perfect in an outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15103411     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-004-0552-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  29 in total

1.  Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors.

Authors:  T G Schuster; B K Hollenbeck; G J Faerber; J S Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  The management of urinary calculi in pregnancy.

Authors:  H J Evans; T A Wollin
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  [Remifentanil. Early clinical experiences with 3100 patients].

Authors:  W Wilhelm; A Biedler; R Larsen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Transurethral ureteroscopy: is local anesthesia with intravenous sedation sufficiently effective and safe?

Authors:  C Miroglu; L Saporta
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  [Ureteroscopy under local anesthesia with or without intravenous analgesia].

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; N Stavropoulos; C Macrochoritis; G Koutsokalis; D Picramenos; A Kostakopoulos
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 0.915

6.  Ureteroscopy with intravenous sedation for treatment of distal ureteral calculi: a safe and effective alternative to shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  D H Hosking; R J Bard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso; M Beaghler; P Loisides
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Use of intravenous alfentanil-midazolam anesthesia for sedation during brief endourologic procedures.

Authors:  D A Schow; T L Jackson; J M Samson; S A Hightower; D L Johnson
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women?

Authors:  F Yalçinkaya; H Topaloğlu; E Ozmen; S Unal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Indirect memory during anesthesia. The effect of midazolam.

Authors:  C L Westmoreland; P S Sebel; E Winograd; W P Goldman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesia in endourological and robot-assisted interventions].

Authors:  T Kiss; T Bluth; A Heller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Urological surgery with analogosedation and local anesthesia. What makes sense?].

Authors:  S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; M Schenck
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.