Literature DB >> 9231937

Age-associated differences in sensori-motor function and balance in community dwelling women.

S R Lord1, J A Ward.   

Abstract

Tests of visual, vestibular, sensori-motor and balance function were administered to 550 women, aged between 20 and 99 years at a Balance and Gait Laboratory. All of the sensory, motor and balance system measures showed significant age-associated differences. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the measures of lower limb sensation were the consistent sensori-motor factors contributing to balance under normal conditions (standing on a firm surface with eyes open or closed). Under more challenging conditions (standing on foam with eyes open) vision, strength and reaction time played significant roles, whilst when standing on foam with eyes closed, vestibular function also made a significant contribution. Analysis of percentage increases in sway under conditions where visual and peripheral sensation systems were removed or diminished, compared with sway under optimal conditions, indicated that up until age 65 there was an increased reliance on vision for balance control. Beyond this age, the contribution made by vision declined, so that in the oldest age-groups reduced vision was less able to supplement peripheral input, resulting in increased sway areas. Peripheral sensation however was the most important sensory system in the maintenance of static postural stability at all ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9231937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  56 in total

Review 1.  Use of a physiological profile to document motor impairment in ageing and in clinical groups.

Authors:  S R Lord; K Delbaere; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Measuring change in somatosensation across the lifespan.

Authors:  Winnie Dunn; James W Griffith; Dory Sabata; Mary T Morrison; Joy C MacDermid; Amy Darragh; Roseann Schaaf; Brian Dudgeon; Lisa Tabor Connor; Leeanne Carey; Jennifer Tanquary
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Relative impact of radiographic osteoarthritis and pain on quadriceps strength, proprioception, static postural sway and lower limb function.

Authors:  M C Hall; S P Mockett; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Loading and bone fragility.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  The effect of quadriceps muscle fatigue on position matching at the knee.

Authors:  Nathan J Givoni; Tuan Pham; Trevor J Allen; Uwe Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Association between ankle muscle strength and limit of stability in older adults.

Authors:  Itshak Melzer; Nissim Benjuya; Jacob Kaplanski; Neil Alexander
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  The contribution of mechanoreceptive sensation on stability and adaptation in the young and elderly.

Authors:  Mitesh Patel; Mans Magnusson; Ella Kristinsdottir; Per-Anders Fransson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The role of neuromuscular changes in aging and knee osteoarthritis on dynamic postural control.

Authors:  Judit Takacs; Mark G Carpenter; S Jayne Garland; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.745

9.  Age-related differences in postural control: effects of the complexity of visual manipulation and sensorimotor contribution to postural performance.

Authors:  Diana R Toledo; José A Barela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interpreting the need for initial support to perform tandem stance tests of balance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Hile; Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.