Literature DB >> 9227575

Effect of ventricular contraction, pressure, and wall stretch on vessels at different locations in the wall.

M A Vis1, P H Bovendeerd, P Sipkema, N Westerhof.   

Abstract

A cylindrical model of the heart was used to calculate the influence of ventricular filling and (isovolumic and isobaric) contraction on the cross-sectional area and resistance of a subendocardial and subepicardial maximally dilated arteriole and venule. Contraction is defined as the difference between static diastole and static systole. Furthermore, a small piece of rectangular myocardium containing the vessel was modeled to distinguish between the individual contributions of contractility (i.e., myocardial elastic properties), ventricular pressure, and local circumferential stretch to the changes in vascular area and resistance during contraction. Calculations were performed assuming the muscle fibers ran in either an apex-to-base or a circumferential direction. The results were similar for the two directions. Assuming constant, physiological arteriolar and venular pressures of 45 and 10 mmHg, respectively, coronary blood vessels were predicted not to collapse during ventricular contraction. Moreover, vascular area reduction was found to be larger for the arteriole (approximately 50%) than for the venule (approximately 30%) during both isovolumic and isobaric contractions. Consequently, arteriolar resistance was found to increase more than venular resistance (approximately 340 and 120%, respectively). Subendocardial area reductions were found to be somewhat smaller than subepicardial area reductions for the venule (by approximately 10%) but not for the arteriole. Contractility was found to be the main contributor to the changes in vascular area and resistance in the subepicardium but to contribute by < 50% to the changes in the subendocardium. Because pressure does, but stretch does not, contribute to the area change during isovolumic contraction and the reverse is true during isobaric contraction, it was concluded that although changes in vascular area and resistance may be similar for different contractions, the causes for these changes are very different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9227575     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.6.H2963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  10 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Coronary microcirculation in the beating heart.

Authors:  Fumihiko Kajiya; Toyotaka Yada; Osamu Hiramatsu; Yasuo Ogasawara; Yousuke Inai; Masahito Kajiya
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mechanisms of myocardium-coronary vessel interaction.

Authors:  Dotan Algranati; Ghassan S Kassab; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Dependence of intramyocardial pressure and coronary flow on ventricular loading and contractility: a model study.

Authors:  Peter H M Bovendeerd; Petra Borsje; Theo Arts; Frans N van De Vosse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Modeling to link regional myocardial work, metabolism and blood flows.

Authors:  James B Bassingthwaighte; Daniel A Beard; Brian E Carlson; Ranjan K Dash; Kalyan Vinnakota
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Effects of myocardial function and systemic circulation on regional coronary perfusion.

Authors:  Ravi Namani; Lik C Lee; Yoram Lanir; Benjamin Kaimovitz; Sheikh M Shavik; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-02-20

7.  Non-invasive coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: A benchmark study comparing the diagnostic performance of four different computational methodologies.

Authors:  Jason Matthew Carson; Sanjay Pant; Carl Roobottom; Robin Alcock; Pablo Javier Blanco; Carlos Alberto Bulant; Yuri Vassilevski; Sergey Simakov; Timur Gamilov; Roman Pryamonosov; Fuyou Liang; Xinyang Ge; Yue Liu; Perumal Nithiarasu
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 8.  Overview of mathematical modeling of myocardial blood flow regulation.

Authors:  Ravi Namani; Yoram Lanir; Lik Chuan Lee; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Integrated Regional Cardiac Hemodynamic Imaging and RNA Sequencing Reveal Corresponding Heterogeneity of Ventricular Wall Shear Stress and Endocardial Transcriptome.

Authors:  Margaret E McCormick; Elisabetta Manduchi; Walter R T Witschey; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Christian J Stoeckert; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Peter F Davies
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Estrogen therapy may counterbalance eutrophic remodeling of coronary arteries and increase bradykinin relaxation in a rat model of menopausal hypertension.

Authors:  Mate Matrai; Judit R Hetthéssy; Gyorgy L Nadasy; Bela Szekacs; Metin Mericli; Nandor Acs; Emil Monos; Nissim Arbib; Szabolcs Varbiro
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.