Literature DB >> 17048105

Dependence of intramyocardial pressure and coronary flow on ventricular loading and contractility: a model study.

Peter H M Bovendeerd1, Petra Borsje, Theo Arts, Frans N van De Vosse.   

Abstract

The phasic coronary arterial inflow during the normal cardiac cycle has been explained with simple (waterfall, intramyocardial pump) models, emphasizing the role of ventricular pressure. To explain changes in isovolumic and low afterload beats, these models were extended with the effect of three-dimensional wall stress, nonlinear characteristics of the coronary bed, and extravascular fluid exchange. With the associated increase in the number of model parameters, a detailed parameter sensitivity analysis has become difficult. Therefore we investigated the primary relations between ventricular pressure and volume, wall stress, intramyocardial pressure and coronary blood flow, with a mathematical model with a limited number of parameters. The model replicates several experimental observations: the phasic character of coronary inflow is virtually independent of maximum ventricular pressure, the amplitude of the coronary flow signal varies about proportionally with cardiac contractility, and intramyocardial pressure in the ventricular wall may exceed ventricular pressure. A parameter sensitivity analysis shows that the normalized amplitude of coronary inflow is mainly determined by contractility, reflected in ventricular pressure and, at low ventricular volumes, radial wall stress. Normalized flow amplitude is less sensitive to myocardial coronary compliance and resistance, and to the relation between active fiber stress, time, and sarcomere shortening velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048105      PMCID: PMC1705493          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  29 in total

Review 1.  The mechanical and metabolic basis of myocardial blood flow heterogeneity.

Authors:  J B Bassingthwaighte; D A Beard; Z Li
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.165

2.  Inhibition of coronary blood flow by a vascular waterfall mechanism.

Authors:  J M Downey; E S Kirk
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Diastolic time fraction as a determinant of subendocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Dirk S Fokkema; Jurgen W G E VanTeeffelen; Simone Dekker; Isabelle Vergroesen; Johannes B Reitsma; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Redistribution of coronary microvascular resistance produced by dipyridamole.

Authors:  W M Chilian; S M Layne; E C Klausner; C L Eastham; M L Marcus
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-02

5.  Quantification of the mechanical properties of noncontracting canine myocardium under simultaneous biaxial loading.

Authors:  F C Yin; R K Strumpf; P H Chew; S L Zeger
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Model of the coronary circulation based on pressure dependence of coronary resistance and compliance.

Authors:  P Bruinsma; T Arts; J Dankelman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

7.  Interaction between intramyocardial pressure (IMP) and myocardial circulation.

Authors:  T Arts; R S Reneman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Coronary diastolic pressure-flow relation and zero flow pressure explained on the basis of intramyocardial compliance.

Authors:  J A Spaan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Diastolic-systolic coronary flow differences are caused by intramyocardial pump action in the anesthetized dog.

Authors:  J A Spaan; N P Breuls; J D Laird
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Passive properties of canine left ventricle: diastolic stiffness and restoring forces.

Authors:  S Nikolić; E L Yellin; K Tamura; H Vetter; T Tamura; J S Meisner; R W Frater
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  A tissue-level electromechanical model of the left ventricle: application to the analysis of intraventricular pressure.

Authors:  Virginie Le Rolle; Guy Carrault; Pierre-Yves Richard; Philippe Pibarot; Louis-Gilles Durand; Alfredo I Hernández
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  Numerical simulation of blood flow and pressure drop in the pulmonary arterial and venous circulation.

Authors:  M Umar Qureshi; Gareth D A Vaughan; Christopher Sainsbury; Martin Johnson; Charles S Peskin; Mette S Olufsen; N A Hill
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-03-09

Review 4.  Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 9.090

5.  A simulation study of left ventricular decompression using a double lumen arterial cannula prototype during a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Filip Ježek; Svitlana Strunina; Brian E Carlson; Jiří Hozman
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  Inverse problems in reduced order models of cardiovascular haemodynamics: aspects of data assimilation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Sanjay Pant; Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Irene E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Coronary remodeling and biomechanics: Are we going with the flow in 2020?

Authors:  Patricia E McCallinhart; Benjamin W Scandling; Aaron J Trask
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 8.  Overview of mathematical modeling of myocardial blood flow regulation.

Authors:  Ravi Namani; Yoram Lanir; Lik Chuan Lee; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Cardiorenal Systems Modeling: Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Differential Effects of Antihypertensive Therapies on Hypertrophy Regression.

Authors:  K Melissa Hallow; Charles H Van Brackle; Sommer Anjum; Sergey Ermakov
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  The multi-scale modelling of coronary blood flow.

Authors:  Jack Lee; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.