Literature DB >> 9226656

Rightward attentional bias and left hemisphere dominance in a cue-target light detection task in a callosotomy patient.

G Berlucchi1, S Aglioti, G Tassinari.   

Abstract

Six normal subjects and a callosotomized man with a prefrontal lesion, mostly on the right side, were tested in a reaction time (RT) task involving a key-pressing response to an extrafoveal light target preceded by an extrafoveal light cue. Cues and targets were presented along the horizontal meridian at 4 degrees and 12 degrees on the right and left of fixation. Fixation was maintained throughout each trial. The cue signalled the occurrence of the target within a time window extending from 200 to 4000 misec from the cue, but did not predict target location. Normal controls responded faster to medial than to lateral targets in both fields, but showed no between-field difference, and their RT was not affected by cue location. Furthermore, they showed the so-called 'ipsilateral inhibition' or 'inhibition of return' effect, their RT being longer when cues and targets occurred in the same field than when they occurred in opposite fields. The RT of the callosotomized subject showed a left-right gradient for both cue location and target location, being longest for the leftmost location and shortest for the right locations. In addition, he showed a significant advantage for the right hand regardless of cue and target location, as well as a consistent ipsilateral inhibition in the left field, whereas in the right field there was ipsilateral inhibition only at the two longest stimulus onset asynchronies. These results suggest that, at least under these experimental conditions, there was a rightward orientational bias which reflected the taking over of the control of performance by the left hemisphere. This attentional bias was reminiscent of that seen in patients with hemi-inattention from right hemisphere damage, although the callosotomized patient showed no sign of such hemi-inattention in routine clinical tests. On the basis of several considerations the rightward bias could be attributed to the callosal interhemispheric disconnection rather than to the right prefrontal lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9226656     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00022-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Effects of callosal lesions in a model of letter perception.

Authors:  Natalia Shevtsova; James A Reggia
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effector-dependent neglect and splenial disconnection: a spherical deconvolution tractography study.

Authors:  Marine Lunven; Michel Thiebaut De Schotten; Bertrand Glize; Raffaella Migliaccio; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; François Cotton; Paolo Bartolomeo; Gilles Rode
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric biases and the control of visuospatial attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  Kevin M Spencer; Marie T Banich
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 4.  Hemispheric asymmetry: Looking for a novel signature of the modulation of spatial attention in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Recognizing Your Hand and That of Your Romantic Partner.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Aya Murayama; Asako Miura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.