Literature DB >> 9226609

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative investigation of patients' beliefs about the illness.

A Clements1, M Sharpe, S Simkin, J Borrill, K Hawton.   

Abstract

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a disabling chronic condition of uncertain cause. Previous studies have found that patients seen in hospital clinics with the syndrome often strongly believe that their illness is physical in nature and minimize the role of psychological and social factors. There is also evidence that patients cope by avoiding activity. However, almost all of these studies have assessed illness beliefs only by questionnaire. The aim of this study was to explore the nature and origin of illness beliefs in more detail using in-depth interviews and a qualitative analysis of patient responses. Sixty-six consecutive referrals meeting Oxford criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome were recruited. Analysis of responses indicated that, whereas the most commonly described explanation for the illness was a physical one, more than half the patients also believed "stress" had played a role. Patients believed that they could partially control the symptoms by reducing activity but felt helpless to influence the physical disease process and hence the course of the illness. Patients reported that they had arrived at these beliefs about the illness after prolonged reflection on their own experience combined with the reading of media reports, self help books, and patient group literature. The views of health professionals played a relatively small role. There is potentially a considerable opportunity to help patients arrive at a wider and more enabling explanation of their illness when they first present to primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9226609     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00087-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  9 in total

1.  Illness beliefs of adolescents with CFS and their parents: the perceived causes of illness and beliefs about recovery.

Authors:  Maria E Loades; Katharine A Rimes; Kate Lievesley; Sheila Ali; Trudie Chalder
Journal:  Int J Adolesc Med Health       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 2.  A review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Valerie R Anderson; Leonard A Jason; Laura E Hlavaty; Nicole Porter; Jacqueline Cudia
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-05-14

3.  The association of major life events with chronic fatigue.

Authors:  Karen B Schmaling; Thomas L Patterson
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Depression, attribution style and self-esteem in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia patients: is there a link?

Authors:  H J Michielsen; B Van Houdenhove; I Leirs; A Vandenbroeck; P Onghena
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Dismissing chronic illness: A qualitative analysis of negative health care experiences.

Authors:  Stephanie McManimen; Damani McClellan; Jamie Stoothoff; Kristen Gleason; Leonard A Jason
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2019-03-04

Review 6.  Use of formal and informal care among people with prolonged fatigue: a review of the literature.

Authors:  H Elliott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  A qualitative natural history study of ME/CFS in the community.

Authors:  Valerie R Anderson; Leonard A Jason; Laura E Hlavaty
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2013-02-27

8.  A comparison of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome attending separate fatigue clinics based in immunology and psychiatry.

Authors:  P D White; A J Pinching; A Rakib; M Castle; B Hedge; S Priebe
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Illness causal beliefs in Turkish immigrants.

Authors:  Harry Minas; Steven Klimidis; Can Tuncer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.630

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.