Literature DB >> 9226318

Initial clinical assessment of CT-MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy.

K Kagawa1, W R Lee, T E Schultheiss, M A Hunt, A H Shaer, G E Hanks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of image fusion software and compare MRI prostate localization with CT localization in patients undergoing 3D conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a phantom study was performed to ensure the accuracy of image fusion procedure, 22 prostate cancer patients had CT and MRI studies before the start of radiotherapy. Immobilization casts used during radiation treatment were also used for both imaging studies. After the clinical target volume (CTV) (prostate or prostate + seminal vesicles) was defined on CT, slices from the MRI study were reconstructed to precisely match the CT slices by identifying three common bony landmarks on each study. The CTV was separately defined on the matched MRI slices. Data related to the size and location of the prostate were compared between CT and MRI. The spatial relationship between the tip of urethrogram cone on CT and prostate apex seen on MRI was also estimated.
RESULTS: The phantom study showed the registration discrepancies between CT and MRI smaller than 1.0 mm in any pair in comparison. The patient study showed a mean image registration error of 0.9 (+/- 0.6) mm. The average prostate volume was 63.0 (+/- 25.8) cm3 and 50.9 (+/- 22.9) cm3 determined by CT and MRI, respectively. The difference in prostate location with the two studies usually differed at the base and at the apex of the prostate. On the transverse MRI, the prostate apex was situated 7.1 (+/- 4.5) mm dorsal and 15.1 (+/- 4.0) mm cephalad to the tip of urethrogram cone.
CONCLUSIONS: CT-MRI image fusion study made it possible to compare the two modalities directly. MRI localization of the prostate is more accurate than CT, and indicates the distance from cone to apex is 15 mm. CT-MRI image fusion technique provides valuable supplements to CT technology for more precise targeting of the prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9226318     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00620-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

1.  Results of a dummy run of postimplant dosimetry between multi-institutional centers in prostate brachytherapy with 125I seeds.

Authors:  Manabu Aoki; Atsunori Yorozu; Takushi Dokiya
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Hentschel; Wolfgang Oehler; Dirk Strauss; Andreas Ulrich; Ansgar Malich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Validation of the CT-MRI image registration with a dedicated phantom.

Authors:  Sofia Spampinato; Anna Maria Gueli; Luigi Raffaele; Concetta Stancampiano; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Radiation treatment for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  David E Greene; Jyoti S Mayadev; Richard K Valicenti
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06

5.  CT AND MRI FUSION FOR POSTIMPLANT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY EVALUATION.

Authors:  Ehsan Dehghan; Yi Le; Junghoon Lee; Daniel Y Song; Gabor Fichtinger; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2016-06-16

6.  Guidance of treatment decisions in risk-adapted primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a single center experience.

Authors:  Cedric Panje; Thierry Panje; Paul Martin Putora; Suk-Kyum Kim; Sarah Haile; Daniel M Aebersold; Ludwig Plasswilm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Image fusion techniques in permanent seed implantation.

Authors:  Alfredo Polo
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-10-13

8.  Post-implant computed tomography-magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information.

Authors:  Sandra Vidakovic; Hans S Jans; Abe Alexander; Ron S Sloboda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A comparison of preplan MRI and preplan CT-based prostate volume with intraoperative ultrasound-based prostate volume in real-time permanent brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hyeli Park; Ja Young Kim; Bo Mi Lee; Sei Kyung Chang; Seung Young Ko; Sung Jun Kim; Dong Soo Park; Hyun Soo Shin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure.

Authors:  Helen A McNair; Emma J Harris; Vibeke N Hansen; Karen Thomas; Christopher South; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.