Literature DB >> 9225406

Is non-metropolitan residence a risk factor for poor birth outcome in the U.S.?

E H Larson1, L G Hart, R A Rosenblatt.   

Abstract

The association between non-metropolitan residence and the risk of poor birth outcome in the United States was examined using the records of 11.06 million singleton births in the United States between 1985 and 1987. Rates of neonatal and post-neonatal death, low birth weight and late prenatal care among non-metropolitan residents were compared to the rates among metropolitan residents. The association between residence in a non-metropolitan area and the risk of poor birth outcome was assessed in national and state level regression analyses. Residence in a non-metropolitan county was not found to be associated with increased risk of low birth weight or neonatal mortality at the national level or in most states, after controlling for several demographic and biological risk factors. Non-metropolitan residence was associated with greater risk of post-neonatal mortality at the national level. Non-metropolitan residence was strongly associated with late initiation of prenatal care at both the national level and in a majority of the states. Residence in non-metropolitan areas does not appear to be associated with higher risk of adverse birth outcome. Regionalization of perinatal care and other changes in the rural health care system may have mitigated the risk associated with residing in areas relatively isolated from tertiary care. High levels of late prenatal care among non-metropolitan residents suggest a continuing problem of access to routine care for rural women and their infants that may be associated with higher levels of post-neonatal mortality and childhood morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9225406     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications.

Authors:  Kathy L Kyser; Xin Lu; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Stephen K Hunter; Alison G Cahill; Peter Cram
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The Manitoba Healthy Baby Prenatal Benefit Program: who is participating?

Authors:  Marni D Brownell; Anne Guevremont; Wendy Au; Monica Sirski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

4.  How racial and ethnic groupings may mask disparities: the importance of separating Pacific Islanders from Asians in prenatal care data.

Authors:  Clea C Sarnquist; Erin Moix Grieb; Yvonne A Maldonado
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-07-07

5.  Risk Differences in Disease-Specific Infant Mortality Between Black and White US Children, 1968-2015: an Epidemiologic Investigation.

Authors:  David T Mage; E Maria Donner; Laurens Holmes
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-06-11

6.  Birth outcomes across three rural-urban typologies in the Finger Lakes region of New York.

Authors:  Kelly L Strutz; Ann M Dozier; Edwin van Wijngaarden; J Christopher Glantz
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Use of high-technology care among women with high-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  R M Schwartz; J H Muri; M D Overpeck; J C Pezzullo; M D Kogan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-03

8.  Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Sarah Newbery; Len Kelly; Bruce Weaver; Scott Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  The relationship between rural status, individual characteristics, and self-rated health in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Traci N Bethea; Russell P Lopez; Yvette C Cozier; Laura F White; Michael D McClean
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Ethnic differences in stillbirth and early neonatal mortality in The Netherlands.

Authors:  A C J Ravelli; M Tromp; M Eskes; J C Droog; J A M van der Post; K J Jager; B W Mol; J B Reitsma
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.