Literature DB >> 9224831

Saccadic eye movements to visual and auditory targets.

L Yao1, C K Peck.   

Abstract

Recent neurophysiological studies of the saccadic ocular motor system have lent support to the hypothesis that this system uses a motor error signal in retinotopic coordinates to direct saccades to both visual and auditory targets. With visual targets, the coordinates of the sensory and motor error signals will be identical unless the eyes move between the time of target presentation and the time of saccade onset. However, targets from other modalities must undergo different sensory-motor transformations to access the same motor error map. Because auditory targets are initially localized in head-centered coordinates, analyzing the metrics of saccades from different starting positions allows a determination of whether the coordinates of the motor signals are those of the sensory system. We studied six human subjects who made saccades to visual or auditory targets from a central fixation point or from one at 10 degrees to the right or left of the midline of the head. Although the latencies of saccades to visual targets increased as stimulus eccentricity increased, the latencies of saccades to auditory targets decreased as stimulus eccentricity increased. The longest auditory latencies were for the smallest values of motor error (the difference between target position and fixation eye position) or desired saccade size, regardless of the position of the auditory target relative to the head or the amplitude of the executed saccade. Similarly, differences in initial eye position did not affect the accuracy of saccades of the same desired size. When saccadic error was plotted as a function of motor error, the curves obtained at the different fixation positions overlapped completely. Thus, saccadic programs in the central nervous system compensated for eye position regardless of the modality of the saccade target, supporting the hypothesis that the saccadic ocular motor system uses motor error signals to direct saccades to auditory targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224831     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Auditory signals evolve from hybrid- to eye-centered coordinates in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of gaze direction on sound localization in brain-injured and normal adults.

Authors:  Eunhui Lie; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jung-Eun Lee; Adrian Lasker; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Cross-modal links in spatial attention.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Similar prevalence and magnitude of auditory-evoked and visually evoked activity in the frontal eye fields: implications for multisensory motor control.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Daniel S Pages; Marc A Sommer; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visually guided saccades and acoustic distractors: no evidence for the remote distractor effect or global effect.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Luc Tremblay; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Deciding where to look based on visual, auditory, and semantic information.

Authors:  Kyeong-Jin Tark; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.