Literature DB >> 9224666

Assessment of fracture risk by bone density measurements.

M Jergas1, C C Glüer.   

Abstract

Bone densitometry in its various applications has become an established tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Bone density has been shown to be significantly associated with the risk of future fracture in many prospective studies. From long-term prospective studies, it can be concluded that peak bone density and bone loss are important predictors of subsequent fracture, and that fracture can be predicted over a longer period. Bone density predicts fracture even in elderly persons aged 80 years and older. However, in this population some fractures, such as the cervical hip fracture, may be more strongly influenced by other risk factors. The differences between the various densitometric techniques in predicting future osteoporotic fracture of any type is marginal. However, it seems that bone density measurements at the site of fracture do perform better than measurements at other sites. There is no evidence that measuring a second site improves the diagnostic capability of bone densitometry. The association between bone density and future fracture is partly independent of age and other significant predictors of fracture such as falls, cognizance, and mobility. Quantitative ultrasonic measures of bone quality have been shown to have a predictive capability that is comparable to that of bone density. From the perspective that bone densitometry and quantitative ultrasound independently predict fractures, these measures actually seem complementary rather than competitive. Simple geometric measures of the bones such as hip axis length and vertebral depth may be derived from images of bone densitometry scans and are also predictive of hip fracture or vertebral fracture independently of bone density. Using the current knowledge of the association between bone density, quantitative ultrasound, geometric properties, and fractures as well as clinical risk factors, new models for fracture prediction can be developed for future application in clinical practice for the benefit of the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224666     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(97)80028-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  11 in total

Review 1.  Superiority of age and weight as variables in predicting osteoporosis in postmenopausal white women.

Authors:  Manfred Wildner; Andrea Peters; Vibhavendra S Raghuvanshi; Jörg Hohnloser; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Differential Age-related Changes in Bone Geometry between the Humerus and the Femur in Healthy Men.

Authors:  Matti D Allen; S Jared McMillan; Cliff S Klein; Charles L Rice; Greg D Marsh
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 3.  Genetics of osteoporosis from genome-wide association studies: advances and challenges.

Authors:  J Brent Richards; Hou-Feng Zheng; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Unveiling the mysteries of the genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  N Alonso; S H Ralston
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sheng-Dan Jiang; Li-Yang Dai; Lei-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  An approach to the patient with osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Mumtaz
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2001-01

7.  Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; S B Jaglal; N Kreiger; W J McIsaac; G A Darlington; J V Tu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; W J McIsaac; G Hawker; L Jaakkimainen; S M Cadarette; B T Chan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The Lichfield bone study: the skeletal response to exercise in healthy young men.

Authors:  Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Jaikirty S Rawal; Anthony Kehoe; Laurence E James; John R Payne; James R Skipworth; Zudin A Puthucheary; Fotios Drenos; Dudley J Pennell; Mike Loosemore; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Fares S Haddad; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-23

10.  Development and validation of osteoporosis prescreening model for Iranian postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Nassim Matin; Omidreza Tabatabaie; Abbasali Keshtkar; Kamran Yazdani; Mojgan Asadi
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2015-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.