Literature DB >> 9221846

Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum--an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship.

R J Heald1, R K Smedh, A Kald, R Sexton, B J Moran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to test the efficacy of an extreme policy of sphincter conservation by combining precise total mesorectal excision with low stapling techniques and endoluminal lavage to guard against implantation.
METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive operations for cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge has been prospectively documented and followed for a mean of 7.7 (range, 1-18) years. A total of 105 of the operations were anterior resections (77 percent), and 31 were abdominoperineal excisions (23 percent).
RESULTS: The oncologic results in the 105 patients who underwent anterior resections appear greatly superior to those of the patients who underwent abdominoperineal excisions, although the number of abdominoperineal excisions was small (31). Actuarial local recurrence at six years for anterior resection and total mesorectal excision was 1 percent for 85 curative procedures and 4 percent for all cases (n = 100), compared with 33 and 47 percent for abdominoperineal excisions (n = 15 and 31). Only four recurrences were observed below the level of the levators, three in the wound of an abdominoperineal excision and one in a stapled anastomosis after a palliative excision. No cases of nodal metastasis in the ischiorectal fossa were observed.
CONCLUSION: In a unit specializing in sphincter conservation, precise total mesorectal excision from above appears oncologically superior to abdominoperineal excision. Three-fourths of patients with carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum can be offered sphincter-conserving surgery, although temporary defunctioning is probably prudent in such cases. The wound of an abdominoperineal excision may be a prerequisite for perineal recurrence, which may often be caused by implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9221846     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  63 in total

1.  [Locally recurrent rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  Th Lehnert; M Golling; J Buchholz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; T Cheung; J S Knight; P H Nichols; S A Pilkington; A H Mirnezami
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Anatomy of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a controversial point of view.

Authors:  Guo-Jun Wang; Chun-Fang Gao; Dong Wei; Cun Wang; Wen-Jian Meng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER).

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; H Pandya; T Sharp; N G Hurst; W J Speake; G M Tierney; J N Lund
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Outcomes of surgery for mid and distal rectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Hok Kwok Choi; Judy Wc Ho; Yee Man Lee; Chi Leung Seto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  [Open surgery of the rectum].

Authors:  W Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Abdominoperineal Excision: Technical Challenges in Optimal Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Torbjörn Holm
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

9.  Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?

Authors:  Angela Fischer; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Andreas Zerz; Franc H Hetzer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Di Betta; A D'Hoore; L Filez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.