BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular applications of magnetic resonance (MR) techniques in coronary artery disease have increased considerably in recent years. Technical advantages of MR imaging are the excellent spatial resolution, the characterization of myocardial tissue, and the potential for three-dimensional imaging. These characteristics allow the accurate assessment of left ventricular mass and volume, the differentiation of infarcted from normal tissue, and the determination of systolic wall thickening and regional wall motion abnormalities. METHODS: In addition to the conventionally used spin-echo and cine-echo techniques, newer techniques such as myocardial tagging, ultrafast MR imaging and MR coronary angiography have been developed. These newer techniques allow a more accurate assessment of ventricular function (tagging), myocardial perfusion (ultrafast imaging), and evaluation of stenosis severity (MR coronary angiography). Particularly early detection and flow assessment of stenosed coronary arteries and bypasses by MR angiography would constitute a major breakthrough in cardiovascular MR imaging. Apart from the MR imaging techniques, cardiac metabolism may be well assessed using MR spectroscopy. This provides unique information on the metabolic behaviour of the myocardium under conditions stress-induced ischemia. However, the definite niche of cardiac MR spectroscopy has still to be settled. CONCLUSION: Currently, MR techniques allow the evaluation of anatomy and function (accepted use), perfusion and viability (development phase), and coronary angiography (experimental phase). A particular strength of MR imaging is that one single MR test may encompass cardiac anatomy, perfusion, function, metabolism and coronary angiography. The replacement of multiple diagnostic tests with one MR test may have major effects on cardiovascular healthcare economics and would outweight the cost inherent to the MR angiography procedure.
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular applications of magnetic resonance (MR) techniques in coronary artery disease have increased considerably in recent years. Technical advantages of MR imaging are the excellent spatial resolution, the characterization of myocardial tissue, and the potential for three-dimensional imaging. These characteristics allow the accurate assessment of left ventricular mass and volume, the differentiation of infarcted from normal tissue, and the determination of systolic wall thickening and regional wall motion abnormalities. METHODS: In addition to the conventionally used spin-echo and cine-echo techniques, newer techniques such as myocardial tagging, ultrafast MR imaging and MR coronary angiography have been developed. These newer techniques allow a more accurate assessment of ventricular function (tagging), myocardial perfusion (ultrafast imaging), and evaluation of stenosis severity (MR coronary angiography). Particularly early detection and flow assessment of stenosed coronary arteries and bypasses by MR angiography would constitute a major breakthrough in cardiovascular MR imaging. Apart from the MR imaging techniques, cardiac metabolism may be well assessed using MR spectroscopy. This provides unique information on the metabolic behaviour of the myocardium under conditions stress-induced ischemia. However, the definite niche of cardiac MR spectroscopy has still to be settled. CONCLUSION: Currently, MR techniques allow the evaluation of anatomy and function (accepted use), perfusion and viability (development phase), and coronary angiography (experimental phase). A particular strength of MR imaging is that one single MR test may encompass cardiac anatomy, perfusion, function, metabolism and coronary angiography. The replacement of multiple diagnostic tests with one MR test may have major effects on cardiovascular healthcare economics and would outweight the cost inherent to the MR angiography procedure.
Authors: N A Matheijssen; H W Louwerenburg; F P van Rugge; R P Arens; B Kauer; A de Roos; E E van der Wall Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: P R van Dijkman; E E van der Wall; A de Roos; N A Matheijssen; A C van Rossum; J Doornbos; A van der Laarse; A E van Voorthuisen; A V Bruschke Journal: Radiology Date: 1991-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P M Pattynama; H J Lamb; E A Van der Velde; R J Van der Geest; E E Van der Wall; A De Roos Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1995 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: F P van Rugge; E E van der Wall; P R van Dijkman; H W Louwerenburg; A de Roos; A V Bruschke Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1992-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Susanne C Ladd; Joerg F Debatin; Andreas Stang; Katja Bromen; Susanne Moebus; Michael Nuefer; Elke Gizewski; Isabel Wanke; Arnd Doerfler; Mark E Ladd; Jens Benemann; Raimund Erbel; Michael Forsting; Axel Schmermund; Karl-Heinz Jöckel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-10-07 Impact factor: 5.315