Literature DB >> 9219781

Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up.

K Bersentes1, M B Fennerty, R E Sampliner, H S Garewal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Change in colon polyp size over time has not been well characterized. It has been inferred that some polyps will increase in size, leading to an increased risk of progressing to cancer, whereas other polyps may spontaneously regress. To develop a better understanding of the natural history of colon polyps, we prospectively investigated change in polyp size over a 2-yr period.
METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they had an endoscopically detected proximal rectal or sigmoid polyp measuring 3-9 mm. The index polyp site was then permanently marked with an adjacent India ink tattoo to allow definitive future localization of the polyp. Patients underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy at 6-month intervals, and at each examination, the polyp size was carefully measured with open biopsy forceps. After a maximum of 2 yr, each polyp was removed and the histology determined.
RESULTS: Thirty polyps were followed in 26 patients who completed the study. Twelve polyps were tubular adenomas (TA), one was tubulovillous, 14 were hyperplastic polyps (HP), two had no pathological diagnosis, and one was a leiomyoma. HP were more likely to decrease in size than were TA. Three polyps demonstrated fast growth rates (2-4 mm/yr), and all were TA. Two polyps were removed early because their size had reached 1 cm or more. Both of those polyps were TA. No polyps regressed completely during the 2 yr of the study; neither did we find consistent linear growth rates.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prior reports, in this study, after polyps had been definitively localized with India ink, we observed no complete polyp regressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Sporadic adenomatous polyp regression with exisulind is effective but toxic: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose-response study.

Authors:  N Arber; S Kuwada; M Leshno; R Sjodahl; R Hultcrantz; D Rex
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology.

Authors:  Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius; Thierry N Boellaard; Margriet C de Haan; C Yung Nio; Maarten G J Thomeer; Shandra Bipat; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Low frequency of polyps in colonic regions with diverticulosis.

Authors:  Irving Levine; Amol S Rangnekar; Aaron Z Tokayer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; J Louis Hinshaw; Duncan Barlow; Don Jensen; Mark Reichelderfer; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Marjolein J E Greuter; Johannes Berkhof; Remond J A Fijneman; Erhan Demirel; Jie-Bin Lew; Gerrit A Meijer; Jaap Stoker; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Defining the Risk of Small Polyps: Potential Value of CTC.

Authors:  Brooks D Cash; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Determinants of polyp size in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Albert B Lowenfels; J Luke Williams; Jennifer L Holub; Patrick Maisonneuve; David A Lieberman
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection.

Authors:  Moon Hee Yang; Juhee Cho; Sanjay Rampal; Eun Kyung Choi; Yoon-Ho Choi; Jun Haeng Lee; Young-Ho Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Eliseo Guallar; Jong Chul Rhee; Hee Jung Son
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  CD80 down-regulation is associated to aberrant DNA methylation in non-inflammatory colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Melania Scarpa; Ignazio Castagliuolo; Francesca Erroi; Silvia Basato; Paola Brun; Imerio Angriman; Carlo Castoro
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.