Literature DB >> 9219290

Tonic vergence and vergence adaptation.

M Rosenfield1.   

Abstract

In the absence of an adequate visual stimulus, the eyes are typically converged by approximately 0.25 to 0.75 meter angles (MA). This vergence response (VR) was believed to reflect the level of tonic innervation to the extraocular muscles, and accordingly has been termed tonic vergence (TV). However, this estimation fails to consider the magnitude of the anatomical position of rest. The true typical value of TV is approximately 23 degrees. This paper will consider various aspects of this parameter, including both clinical and laboratory methods of measurement, and the relationship between TV and the distance heterophoria. In addition, the role of vergence (or prism) adaptation, i.e., the apparent change in TV after periods of sustained fixation, is discussed. This shift appears to result from the relatively prolonged decay of the slow fusional vergence response (VR), with no evidence for a change in the level of tonic innervation. On occasion, the decay of slow fusional vergence may take hours or even days to reach completion. This extended rate of decay will have a significant impact upon the clinical measurement of a number of binocular parameters, most notably the assessment of heterophoria under truly dissociated conditions (i.e., in the absence of any fusional VR). Furthermore, both the magnitude and rate of decay of vergence adaptation appear to vary with age, as well as the presence of oculomotor imbalance. It is concluded that the output of the slow fusional vergence mechanism, as reflected by the degree of vergence adaptation, makes a major contribution to the aggregate, sustained VR in most visually normal patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219290     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199705000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  14 in total

1.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Phoria adaptation after sustained symmetrical convergence: Influence of saccades.

Authors:  S H Ying; D S Zee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The horizontal dark oculomotor rest position.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; Mark T Madsen; David J Kramer
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Gaze-evoked nystagmus induced by alcohol intoxication.

Authors:  Fausto Romano; Alexander A Tarnutzer; Dominik Straumann; Stefano Ramat; Giovanni Bertolini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison, within-session repeatability and normative data of three phoria tests.

Authors:  Alessio Facchin; Silvio Maffioletti
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-08-04

8.  The prescribing of prisms in clinical practice.

Authors:  Lyle S Gray
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Objective Measurement of Fusional Vergence Ranges and Heterophoria in Infants and Preschool Children.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Erin E Babinsky; Yifei Wu; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Disparity vergence responses before versus after repetitive vergence therapy in binocularly normal controls.

Authors:  Henry Talasan; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.