Literature DB >> 9219185

Representation and analysis of medical decision problems with influence diagrams.

D K Owens1, R D Shachter, R F Nease.   

Abstract

Influence diagrams are a powerful graphic representation for decision models, complementary to decision trees. Influence diagrams and decision trees are different graphic representations for the same underlying mathematical model and operations. This article describes the elements of an influence diagram, and shows several familiar decision problems represented as decision trees and as influence diagrams. The authors also contrast the information highlighted in each graphic representation, demonstrate how to calculate the expected utilities of decision alternatives modeled with an influence diagram, provide an overview of the conceptual basis of the solution algorithms that have been developed for influence diagrams, discuss the strengths and limitations of influence diagrams relative to decision trees, and describe the mathematical operations that are used to evaluate both decision trees and influence diagrams. They use clinical examples to illustrate the mathematical operations of the influence-diagram-evaluation algorithm; these operations are arc reversal, chance node removal by averaging, and decision node removal by policy determination. Influence diagrams may be helpful when problems have a high degree of conditional independence, when large models are needed, when communication of the probabilistic relationships is important, or when the analysis requires extensive Bayesian updating. The choice of graphic representation should be governed by convenience, and will depend on the problem being analyzed, on the experience of the analyst, and on the background of the consumers of the analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219185     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  9 in total

Review 1.  A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Karen L Bierman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2004-09

2.  Crossing the evidence chasm: building evidence bridges from process changes to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  David C Kendrick; Davis Bu; Eric Pan; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Modelling methods for pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment: an overview and guide.

Authors:  James E Stahl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Use of medical informatics to implement and develop clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D K Owens
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-03

5.  Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--2.

Authors:  Mark Roberts; Louise B Russell; A David Paltiel; Michael Chambers; Phil McEwan; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  A new approach to optimal dynamic therapy planning.

Authors:  P Magni
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

7.  A diagnostic reasoning and optimal treatment model for bacterial infections with fuzzy information.

Authors:  Han-Ying Kao; Han-Lin Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study.

Authors:  Leonie Diedrich; Melanie Brinkmann; Maren Dreier; Wendelin Schramm; Christian Krauth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Bayesian networks for clinical decision support in lung cancer care.

Authors:  M Berkan Sesen; Ann E Nicholson; Rene Banares-Alcantara; Timor Kadir; Michael Brady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.